Why specifically branches as firewood on the Altar? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhy was the side door to the hechal unlocked so oddly?Nahmanides on the Golden AltarWhy didn't kohanim undress themselves?Why is there such fervor to say the blessing on blossoming fruit trees?How is the small side of a lamb the “large” side?In 1 Melachim 2, what does it mean Yoav took hold of the horns of the altar?Where did the incense-altar sweeper get his broom from?Did the Maccabees properly restore the temple?Why were there so many Karbanos Eitzim in Av, and so few during the rest of the year?Why does the ash-clearing kohen get a reminder of where the shovel is?

What connection does MS Office have to Netscape Navigator?

Which one is the true statement?

Why, when going from special to general relativity, do we just replace partial derivatives with covariant derivatives?

Grabbing quick drinks

Poetry, calligrams and TikZ/PStricks challenge

Flying from Cape Town to England and return to another province

How to write a definition with variants?

What steps are necessary to read a Modern SSD in Medieval Europe?

Legal workarounds for testamentary trust perceived as unfair

Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons

When you upcast Blindness/Deafness, do all targets suffer the same effect?

The past simple of "gaslight" – "gaslighted" or "gaslit"?

Axiom Schema vs Axiom

Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?

Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"

Defamation due to breach of confidentiality

WOW air has ceased operation, can I get my tickets refunded?

Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?

Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?

Why do remote US companies require working in the US?

Can MTA send mail via a relay without being told so?

How to delete every two lines after 3rd lines in a file contains very large number of lines?

RigExpert AA-35 - Interpreting The Information

Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin



Why specifically branches as firewood on the Altar?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhy was the side door to the hechal unlocked so oddly?Nahmanides on the Golden AltarWhy didn't kohanim undress themselves?Why is there such fervor to say the blessing on blossoming fruit trees?How is the small side of a lamb the “large” side?In 1 Melachim 2, what does it mean Yoav took hold of the horns of the altar?Where did the incense-altar sweeper get his broom from?Did the Maccabees properly restore the temple?Why were there so many Karbanos Eitzim in Av, and so few during the rest of the year?Why does the ash-clearing kohen get a reminder of where the shovel is?










2















In Tamid 2:3, the Mishna tells us that the kohanim would bring גִזְרִין - logs - every morning to serve as the fuel for the fire on the Altar. It goes on to report that most types of wood are eligible, but that




בְּאֵלּוּ רְגִילִין, בְּמֻרְבִּיּוֹת שֶׁל תְּאֵנָה וְשֶׁל אֱגוֹז וְשֶׁל עֵץ שָׁמֶן



It was [the wood] of these [trees] they commonly used, branches of a fig tree, walnut [tree] or an oil [tree].




What does the word מֻרְבִּיּוֹת, "branches" at least according to R' Ovadia Mibartenura, tell us here? Was the common practice to use branches specifically, as opposed to trunks of these trees? If so, why? Was it that the branches tended to more closely match the necessary dimensions of the logs that were required? Was it because branches were more of a renewable resource, not requiring the destruction of a whole tree to harvest?










share|improve this question






















  • Mishna Succa 4.5 יורדין לשם ומלקטין משם מורביות של ערבה

    – kouty
    25 mins ago















2















In Tamid 2:3, the Mishna tells us that the kohanim would bring גִזְרִין - logs - every morning to serve as the fuel for the fire on the Altar. It goes on to report that most types of wood are eligible, but that




בְּאֵלּוּ רְגִילִין, בְּמֻרְבִּיּוֹת שֶׁל תְּאֵנָה וְשֶׁל אֱגוֹז וְשֶׁל עֵץ שָׁמֶן



It was [the wood] of these [trees] they commonly used, branches of a fig tree, walnut [tree] or an oil [tree].




What does the word מֻרְבִּיּוֹת, "branches" at least according to R' Ovadia Mibartenura, tell us here? Was the common practice to use branches specifically, as opposed to trunks of these trees? If so, why? Was it that the branches tended to more closely match the necessary dimensions of the logs that were required? Was it because branches were more of a renewable resource, not requiring the destruction of a whole tree to harvest?










share|improve this question






















  • Mishna Succa 4.5 יורדין לשם ומלקטין משם מורביות של ערבה

    – kouty
    25 mins ago













2












2








2








In Tamid 2:3, the Mishna tells us that the kohanim would bring גִזְרִין - logs - every morning to serve as the fuel for the fire on the Altar. It goes on to report that most types of wood are eligible, but that




בְּאֵלּוּ רְגִילִין, בְּמֻרְבִּיּוֹת שֶׁל תְּאֵנָה וְשֶׁל אֱגוֹז וְשֶׁל עֵץ שָׁמֶן



It was [the wood] of these [trees] they commonly used, branches of a fig tree, walnut [tree] or an oil [tree].




What does the word מֻרְבִּיּוֹת, "branches" at least according to R' Ovadia Mibartenura, tell us here? Was the common practice to use branches specifically, as opposed to trunks of these trees? If so, why? Was it that the branches tended to more closely match the necessary dimensions of the logs that were required? Was it because branches were more of a renewable resource, not requiring the destruction of a whole tree to harvest?










share|improve this question














In Tamid 2:3, the Mishna tells us that the kohanim would bring גִזְרִין - logs - every morning to serve as the fuel for the fire on the Altar. It goes on to report that most types of wood are eligible, but that




בְּאֵלּוּ רְגִילִין, בְּמֻרְבִּיּוֹת שֶׁל תְּאֵנָה וְשֶׁל אֱגוֹז וְשֶׁל עֵץ שָׁמֶן



It was [the wood] of these [trees] they commonly used, branches of a fig tree, walnut [tree] or an oil [tree].




What does the word מֻרְבִּיּוֹת, "branches" at least according to R' Ovadia Mibartenura, tell us here? Was the common practice to use branches specifically, as opposed to trunks of these trees? If so, why? Was it that the branches tended to more closely match the necessary dimensions of the logs that were required? Was it because branches were more of a renewable resource, not requiring the destruction of a whole tree to harvest?







trees maseches-tamid altar temple-service-avoda






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 4 hours ago









Isaac MosesIsaac Moses

32.7k1287274




32.7k1287274












  • Mishna Succa 4.5 יורדין לשם ומלקטין משם מורביות של ערבה

    – kouty
    25 mins ago

















  • Mishna Succa 4.5 יורדין לשם ומלקטין משם מורביות של ערבה

    – kouty
    25 mins ago
















Mishna Succa 4.5 יורדין לשם ומלקטין משם מורביות של ערבה

– kouty
25 mins ago





Mishna Succa 4.5 יורדין לשם ומלקטין משם מורביות של ערבה

– kouty
25 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














The unknown commentary1 to this Mishnah in the Talmud says that branches burn easily and do not produce [too much] smoke. He also states several other advantages for using younger branches than older wood. Raavad even calls these the ‘best’ of the wood. The Talmud itself (Rabbi Eliezer, 29b) lists additional possible woods which were used, such as: lote, sycamore, oak, palm, carob.



Other problems mentioned in the commentaries (e.g. Rosh) is not to have a product which leaves over a lot of ash, because it is troublesome to those who must remove it.



Also, make sure there are no worms in your wood!




  1. Or not, see Shita Mikubetzes from Tosfos, Yoma 16b, ‘haShulchanos’.





share|improve this answer






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    The unknown commentary1 to this Mishnah in the Talmud says that branches burn easily and do not produce [too much] smoke. He also states several other advantages for using younger branches than older wood. Raavad even calls these the ‘best’ of the wood. The Talmud itself (Rabbi Eliezer, 29b) lists additional possible woods which were used, such as: lote, sycamore, oak, palm, carob.



    Other problems mentioned in the commentaries (e.g. Rosh) is not to have a product which leaves over a lot of ash, because it is troublesome to those who must remove it.



    Also, make sure there are no worms in your wood!




    1. Or not, see Shita Mikubetzes from Tosfos, Yoma 16b, ‘haShulchanos’.





    share|improve this answer



























      2














      The unknown commentary1 to this Mishnah in the Talmud says that branches burn easily and do not produce [too much] smoke. He also states several other advantages for using younger branches than older wood. Raavad even calls these the ‘best’ of the wood. The Talmud itself (Rabbi Eliezer, 29b) lists additional possible woods which were used, such as: lote, sycamore, oak, palm, carob.



      Other problems mentioned in the commentaries (e.g. Rosh) is not to have a product which leaves over a lot of ash, because it is troublesome to those who must remove it.



      Also, make sure there are no worms in your wood!




      1. Or not, see Shita Mikubetzes from Tosfos, Yoma 16b, ‘haShulchanos’.





      share|improve this answer

























        2












        2








        2







        The unknown commentary1 to this Mishnah in the Talmud says that branches burn easily and do not produce [too much] smoke. He also states several other advantages for using younger branches than older wood. Raavad even calls these the ‘best’ of the wood. The Talmud itself (Rabbi Eliezer, 29b) lists additional possible woods which were used, such as: lote, sycamore, oak, palm, carob.



        Other problems mentioned in the commentaries (e.g. Rosh) is not to have a product which leaves over a lot of ash, because it is troublesome to those who must remove it.



        Also, make sure there are no worms in your wood!




        1. Or not, see Shita Mikubetzes from Tosfos, Yoma 16b, ‘haShulchanos’.





        share|improve this answer













        The unknown commentary1 to this Mishnah in the Talmud says that branches burn easily and do not produce [too much] smoke. He also states several other advantages for using younger branches than older wood. Raavad even calls these the ‘best’ of the wood. The Talmud itself (Rabbi Eliezer, 29b) lists additional possible woods which were used, such as: lote, sycamore, oak, palm, carob.



        Other problems mentioned in the commentaries (e.g. Rosh) is not to have a product which leaves over a lot of ash, because it is troublesome to those who must remove it.



        Also, make sure there are no worms in your wood!




        1. Or not, see Shita Mikubetzes from Tosfos, Yoma 16b, ‘haShulchanos’.






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        Dr. ShmuelDr. Shmuel

        4,3031952




        4,3031952













            Popular posts from this blog

            कुँवर स्रोत दिक्चालन सूची"कुँवर""राणा कुँवरके वंशावली"

            चैत्य भूमि चित्र दीर्घा सन्दर्भ बाहरी कडियाँ दिक्चालन सूची"Chaitya Bhoomi""Chaitya Bhoomi: Statue of Equality in India""Dadar Chaitya Bhoomi: Statue of Equality in India""Ambedkar memorial: Centre okays transfer of Indu Mill land"चैत्यभमि

            शेव्रोले वोल्ट अनुक्रम इतिहास इन्हे भी देखें चित्र दीर्घा संदर्भ दिक्चालन सूची