Constructor for a packagetarget struct The Next CEO of Stack OverflowJava constructor should use setter?Constructor Chaining in JavaImprove testability of constructorFramework constructorCritique of realloc() wrapperCount PDF pages in constructorDownloading images from a forumEmulating constructor overloading in TypescriptOpenGL Shape class constructorFinding the longest word without these characters follow-up

Find non-case sensitive string in a mixed list of elements?

Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?

Easy to read palindrome checker

Why did CATV standarize in 75 ohms and everyone else in 50?

If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?

I want to delete every two lines after 3rd lines in file contain very large number of lines :

How to install OpenCV on Raspbian Stretch?

Can we say or write : "No, it'sn't"?

Is wanting to ask what to write an indication that you need to change your story?

Why do remote US companies require working in the US?

Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?

Math-accent symbol over parentheses enclosing accented symbol (amsmath)

INSERT to a table from a database to other (same SQL Server) using Dynamic SQL

Missile strike detection (but it's not actually a missile)

How many extra stops do monopods offer for tele photographs?

Can a Bladesinger Wizard use Bladesong with a Hand Crossbow?

"misplaced omit" error when >centering columns

What flight has the highest ratio of time difference to flight time?

Does soap repel water?

Newlines in BSD sed vs gsed

Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin

What is the value of α and β in a triangle?

How to get from Geneva Airport to Metabief?

Would a completely good Muggle be able to use a wand?



Constructor for a packagetarget struct



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowJava constructor should use setter?Constructor Chaining in JavaImprove testability of constructorFramework constructorCritique of realloc() wrapperCount PDF pages in constructorDownloading images from a forumEmulating constructor overloading in TypescriptOpenGL Shape class constructorFinding the longest word without these characters follow-up










1












$begingroup$


As many of you know goto is usually signs of code smell. However I thought this could be an appropriate case, and would like confirmation or criticism.



Unnecessary section such as the called functions were removed. Every non-standard function returns an int as status, 0 is "OK"; except linkedlist_open() which returns a pointer which could be NULL if the system runs out of memory.



packagetarget_close() does implement the necessary NULL checks.



packagetarget *packagetarget_open()

packagetarget *target = (packagetarget*) malloc(sizeof(packagetarget));

if (!target) return NULL;

if (packagetarget_setname(target, ""))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setsys(target, PACKAGETARGET_SYS))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setarch(target, PACKAGETARGET_ARCH))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setmin(target, PACKAGETARGET_MIN))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setver(target, PACKAGETARGET_VER))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setmax(target, PACKAGETARGET_MAX))
goto disposer;

linkedlist *comp = linkedlist_open();

if (!comp) goto disposer;

target->comp = comp;

return target;

disposer:
packagetarget_close(target);
return NULL;




Each setter function follows a simple pattern. Since each setter is identical, I will only put the code for packagetarget_setname.



int packagetarget_setname(packagetarget *target, char *name)

if (!target) return 1;

if (!name) return 2;

target->name = realloc(target->name, strlen(name) * sizeof(char));

if (!target->name) return 3;

strcpy(target->name, name);

return 0;



Here is the packagetarget_close function:



void packagetarget_close(packagetarget *target)

if (!target) return;

if (target->name) free(target->name);
if (target->sys) free(target->sys);
if (target->arch) free(target->arch);
if (target->min) free(target->min);
if (target->ver) free(target->ver);
if (target->min) free(target->min);
if (target->comp) linkedlist_close(target->comp);

free(target);

return;



linkedlist_open is a similar function to the packagetarget_open.



linkedlist *linkedlist_open()

linkedlist *list = (linkedlist*) malloc(sizeof(linkedlist));

if (!list) return NULL;

list->head = NULL;
list->length = 0;
list->remhook = NULL;

return list;



The one thing most of these functions is they may fail when the system runs out of memory. So I have implemented checks for each step.










share|improve this question









New contributor




utkumaden is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    "However I thought this could be an appropriate case, and would like confirmation or criticism." Yet you've stripped the code out of all it's context so we can't determine whether you're right or not. The code you've provided looks like it should've been used in a wrapper, not with goto constructs. Please provide more code and an explanation of what it's supposed to do so we can see how this snippet is being used. Stack Overflow likes minimal examples, Code Review does absolutely not. Please take a look at our FAQ on asking questions.
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not all of the functions are written, yet. This function is a constructor for a struct named packagetarget. The idea is to allocate the struct in memory, and then call the setter methods for each field, which may fail. EDIT: If any step fails, the destructor function is called, once; and the function returns a null pointer.
    $endgroup$
    – utkumaden
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    If not all the functions are written, are you sure it works the way it should? And how can you be sure this is the right way to do it if you haven't completed the rest? It sounds like you're simply too early in the process got get this meaningfully reviewed and your question answered.
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I have updated the question to include more code.
    $endgroup$
    – utkumaden
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    What is a constructor in C? I know what a constructor is in C++. Did you mean C++?
    $endgroup$
    – pacmaninbw
    3 hours ago















1












$begingroup$


As many of you know goto is usually signs of code smell. However I thought this could be an appropriate case, and would like confirmation or criticism.



Unnecessary section such as the called functions were removed. Every non-standard function returns an int as status, 0 is "OK"; except linkedlist_open() which returns a pointer which could be NULL if the system runs out of memory.



packagetarget_close() does implement the necessary NULL checks.



packagetarget *packagetarget_open()

packagetarget *target = (packagetarget*) malloc(sizeof(packagetarget));

if (!target) return NULL;

if (packagetarget_setname(target, ""))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setsys(target, PACKAGETARGET_SYS))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setarch(target, PACKAGETARGET_ARCH))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setmin(target, PACKAGETARGET_MIN))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setver(target, PACKAGETARGET_VER))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setmax(target, PACKAGETARGET_MAX))
goto disposer;

linkedlist *comp = linkedlist_open();

if (!comp) goto disposer;

target->comp = comp;

return target;

disposer:
packagetarget_close(target);
return NULL;




Each setter function follows a simple pattern. Since each setter is identical, I will only put the code for packagetarget_setname.



int packagetarget_setname(packagetarget *target, char *name)

if (!target) return 1;

if (!name) return 2;

target->name = realloc(target->name, strlen(name) * sizeof(char));

if (!target->name) return 3;

strcpy(target->name, name);

return 0;



Here is the packagetarget_close function:



void packagetarget_close(packagetarget *target)

if (!target) return;

if (target->name) free(target->name);
if (target->sys) free(target->sys);
if (target->arch) free(target->arch);
if (target->min) free(target->min);
if (target->ver) free(target->ver);
if (target->min) free(target->min);
if (target->comp) linkedlist_close(target->comp);

free(target);

return;



linkedlist_open is a similar function to the packagetarget_open.



linkedlist *linkedlist_open()

linkedlist *list = (linkedlist*) malloc(sizeof(linkedlist));

if (!list) return NULL;

list->head = NULL;
list->length = 0;
list->remhook = NULL;

return list;



The one thing most of these functions is they may fail when the system runs out of memory. So I have implemented checks for each step.










share|improve this question









New contributor




utkumaden is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    "However I thought this could be an appropriate case, and would like confirmation or criticism." Yet you've stripped the code out of all it's context so we can't determine whether you're right or not. The code you've provided looks like it should've been used in a wrapper, not with goto constructs. Please provide more code and an explanation of what it's supposed to do so we can see how this snippet is being used. Stack Overflow likes minimal examples, Code Review does absolutely not. Please take a look at our FAQ on asking questions.
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not all of the functions are written, yet. This function is a constructor for a struct named packagetarget. The idea is to allocate the struct in memory, and then call the setter methods for each field, which may fail. EDIT: If any step fails, the destructor function is called, once; and the function returns a null pointer.
    $endgroup$
    – utkumaden
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    If not all the functions are written, are you sure it works the way it should? And how can you be sure this is the right way to do it if you haven't completed the rest? It sounds like you're simply too early in the process got get this meaningfully reviewed and your question answered.
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I have updated the question to include more code.
    $endgroup$
    – utkumaden
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    What is a constructor in C? I know what a constructor is in C++. Did you mean C++?
    $endgroup$
    – pacmaninbw
    3 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


As many of you know goto is usually signs of code smell. However I thought this could be an appropriate case, and would like confirmation or criticism.



Unnecessary section such as the called functions were removed. Every non-standard function returns an int as status, 0 is "OK"; except linkedlist_open() which returns a pointer which could be NULL if the system runs out of memory.



packagetarget_close() does implement the necessary NULL checks.



packagetarget *packagetarget_open()

packagetarget *target = (packagetarget*) malloc(sizeof(packagetarget));

if (!target) return NULL;

if (packagetarget_setname(target, ""))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setsys(target, PACKAGETARGET_SYS))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setarch(target, PACKAGETARGET_ARCH))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setmin(target, PACKAGETARGET_MIN))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setver(target, PACKAGETARGET_VER))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setmax(target, PACKAGETARGET_MAX))
goto disposer;

linkedlist *comp = linkedlist_open();

if (!comp) goto disposer;

target->comp = comp;

return target;

disposer:
packagetarget_close(target);
return NULL;




Each setter function follows a simple pattern. Since each setter is identical, I will only put the code for packagetarget_setname.



int packagetarget_setname(packagetarget *target, char *name)

if (!target) return 1;

if (!name) return 2;

target->name = realloc(target->name, strlen(name) * sizeof(char));

if (!target->name) return 3;

strcpy(target->name, name);

return 0;



Here is the packagetarget_close function:



void packagetarget_close(packagetarget *target)

if (!target) return;

if (target->name) free(target->name);
if (target->sys) free(target->sys);
if (target->arch) free(target->arch);
if (target->min) free(target->min);
if (target->ver) free(target->ver);
if (target->min) free(target->min);
if (target->comp) linkedlist_close(target->comp);

free(target);

return;



linkedlist_open is a similar function to the packagetarget_open.



linkedlist *linkedlist_open()

linkedlist *list = (linkedlist*) malloc(sizeof(linkedlist));

if (!list) return NULL;

list->head = NULL;
list->length = 0;
list->remhook = NULL;

return list;



The one thing most of these functions is they may fail when the system runs out of memory. So I have implemented checks for each step.










share|improve this question









New contributor




utkumaden is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




As many of you know goto is usually signs of code smell. However I thought this could be an appropriate case, and would like confirmation or criticism.



Unnecessary section such as the called functions were removed. Every non-standard function returns an int as status, 0 is "OK"; except linkedlist_open() which returns a pointer which could be NULL if the system runs out of memory.



packagetarget_close() does implement the necessary NULL checks.



packagetarget *packagetarget_open()

packagetarget *target = (packagetarget*) malloc(sizeof(packagetarget));

if (!target) return NULL;

if (packagetarget_setname(target, ""))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setsys(target, PACKAGETARGET_SYS))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setarch(target, PACKAGETARGET_ARCH))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setmin(target, PACKAGETARGET_MIN))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setver(target, PACKAGETARGET_VER))
goto disposer;
if (packagetarget_setmax(target, PACKAGETARGET_MAX))
goto disposer;

linkedlist *comp = linkedlist_open();

if (!comp) goto disposer;

target->comp = comp;

return target;

disposer:
packagetarget_close(target);
return NULL;




Each setter function follows a simple pattern. Since each setter is identical, I will only put the code for packagetarget_setname.



int packagetarget_setname(packagetarget *target, char *name)

if (!target) return 1;

if (!name) return 2;

target->name = realloc(target->name, strlen(name) * sizeof(char));

if (!target->name) return 3;

strcpy(target->name, name);

return 0;



Here is the packagetarget_close function:



void packagetarget_close(packagetarget *target)

if (!target) return;

if (target->name) free(target->name);
if (target->sys) free(target->sys);
if (target->arch) free(target->arch);
if (target->min) free(target->min);
if (target->ver) free(target->ver);
if (target->min) free(target->min);
if (target->comp) linkedlist_close(target->comp);

free(target);

return;



linkedlist_open is a similar function to the packagetarget_open.



linkedlist *linkedlist_open()

linkedlist *list = (linkedlist*) malloc(sizeof(linkedlist));

if (!list) return NULL;

list->head = NULL;
list->length = 0;
list->remhook = NULL;

return list;



The one thing most of these functions is they may fail when the system runs out of memory. So I have implemented checks for each step.







c error-handling memory-management constructor






share|improve this question









New contributor




utkumaden is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




utkumaden is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 mins ago









200_success

130k17156420




130k17156420






New contributor




utkumaden is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









utkumadenutkumaden

62




62




New contributor




utkumaden is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





utkumaden is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






utkumaden is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    "However I thought this could be an appropriate case, and would like confirmation or criticism." Yet you've stripped the code out of all it's context so we can't determine whether you're right or not. The code you've provided looks like it should've been used in a wrapper, not with goto constructs. Please provide more code and an explanation of what it's supposed to do so we can see how this snippet is being used. Stack Overflow likes minimal examples, Code Review does absolutely not. Please take a look at our FAQ on asking questions.
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not all of the functions are written, yet. This function is a constructor for a struct named packagetarget. The idea is to allocate the struct in memory, and then call the setter methods for each field, which may fail. EDIT: If any step fails, the destructor function is called, once; and the function returns a null pointer.
    $endgroup$
    – utkumaden
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    If not all the functions are written, are you sure it works the way it should? And how can you be sure this is the right way to do it if you haven't completed the rest? It sounds like you're simply too early in the process got get this meaningfully reviewed and your question answered.
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I have updated the question to include more code.
    $endgroup$
    – utkumaden
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    What is a constructor in C? I know what a constructor is in C++. Did you mean C++?
    $endgroup$
    – pacmaninbw
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    "However I thought this could be an appropriate case, and would like confirmation or criticism." Yet you've stripped the code out of all it's context so we can't determine whether you're right or not. The code you've provided looks like it should've been used in a wrapper, not with goto constructs. Please provide more code and an explanation of what it's supposed to do so we can see how this snippet is being used. Stack Overflow likes minimal examples, Code Review does absolutely not. Please take a look at our FAQ on asking questions.
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not all of the functions are written, yet. This function is a constructor for a struct named packagetarget. The idea is to allocate the struct in memory, and then call the setter methods for each field, which may fail. EDIT: If any step fails, the destructor function is called, once; and the function returns a null pointer.
    $endgroup$
    – utkumaden
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    If not all the functions are written, are you sure it works the way it should? And how can you be sure this is the right way to do it if you haven't completed the rest? It sounds like you're simply too early in the process got get this meaningfully reviewed and your question answered.
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I have updated the question to include more code.
    $endgroup$
    – utkumaden
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    What is a constructor in C? I know what a constructor is in C++. Did you mean C++?
    $endgroup$
    – pacmaninbw
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
"However I thought this could be an appropriate case, and would like confirmation or criticism." Yet you've stripped the code out of all it's context so we can't determine whether you're right or not. The code you've provided looks like it should've been used in a wrapper, not with goto constructs. Please provide more code and an explanation of what it's supposed to do so we can see how this snippet is being used. Stack Overflow likes minimal examples, Code Review does absolutely not. Please take a look at our FAQ on asking questions.
$endgroup$
– Mast
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
"However I thought this could be an appropriate case, and would like confirmation or criticism." Yet you've stripped the code out of all it's context so we can't determine whether you're right or not. The code you've provided looks like it should've been used in a wrapper, not with goto constructs. Please provide more code and an explanation of what it's supposed to do so we can see how this snippet is being used. Stack Overflow likes minimal examples, Code Review does absolutely not. Please take a look at our FAQ on asking questions.
$endgroup$
– Mast
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
Not all of the functions are written, yet. This function is a constructor for a struct named packagetarget. The idea is to allocate the struct in memory, and then call the setter methods for each field, which may fail. EDIT: If any step fails, the destructor function is called, once; and the function returns a null pointer.
$endgroup$
– utkumaden
4 hours ago





$begingroup$
Not all of the functions are written, yet. This function is a constructor for a struct named packagetarget. The idea is to allocate the struct in memory, and then call the setter methods for each field, which may fail. EDIT: If any step fails, the destructor function is called, once; and the function returns a null pointer.
$endgroup$
– utkumaden
4 hours ago













$begingroup$
If not all the functions are written, are you sure it works the way it should? And how can you be sure this is the right way to do it if you haven't completed the rest? It sounds like you're simply too early in the process got get this meaningfully reviewed and your question answered.
$endgroup$
– Mast
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
If not all the functions are written, are you sure it works the way it should? And how can you be sure this is the right way to do it if you haven't completed the rest? It sounds like you're simply too early in the process got get this meaningfully reviewed and your question answered.
$endgroup$
– Mast
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
I have updated the question to include more code.
$endgroup$
– utkumaden
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
I have updated the question to include more code.
$endgroup$
– utkumaden
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
What is a constructor in C? I know what a constructor is in C++. Did you mean C++?
$endgroup$
– pacmaninbw
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
What is a constructor in C? I know what a constructor is in C++. Did you mean C++?
$endgroup$
– pacmaninbw
3 hours ago










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






utkumaden is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216545%2fconstructor-for-a-packagetarget-struct%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








utkumaden is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















utkumaden is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












utkumaden is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











utkumaden is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216545%2fconstructor-for-a-packagetarget-struct%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

कुँवर स्रोत दिक्चालन सूची"कुँवर""राणा कुँवरके वंशावली"

चैत्य भूमि चित्र दीर्घा सन्दर्भ बाहरी कडियाँ दिक्चालन सूची"Chaitya Bhoomi""Chaitya Bhoomi: Statue of Equality in India""Dadar Chaitya Bhoomi: Statue of Equality in India""Ambedkar memorial: Centre okays transfer of Indu Mill land"चैत्यभमि

शेव्रोले वोल्ट अनुक्रम इतिहास इन्हे भी देखें चित्र दीर्घा संदर्भ दिक्चालन सूची