What would be the main consequences for a country leaving the WTO? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDoes the WTO itself have any input into trade agreements?Can schedules be bilaterally agreed in the WTO forum?What's Trump frustration with the WTO?Leaving the EU without a deal and MFN rulesHave any prominent Brexiteers argued for the UK to become a duty-free country (like Singapore)?Does the WTO have a concept of “default” or standard tariffs?No-deal Brexit: What would be the basis for a WTO complaint if goods entering Ireland are checked at Dunkirk?Can the UK deal selectively with Ireland post-Brexit without falling afoul of WTO rules?

Do scriptures give a method to recognize a truly self-realized person/jivanmukta?

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

Why the last AS PATH item always is `I` or `?`?

Why don't programming languages automatically manage the synchronous/asynchronous problem?

Regression vs Random Forest - Combination of features

0-rank tensor vs vector in 1D

Is there such a thing as a proper verb, like a proper noun?

Pulling the principal components out of a DimensionReducerFunction?

Is "three point ish" an acceptable use of ish?

Inexact numbers as keys in Association?

Defamation due to breach of confidentiality

Easy to read palindrome checker

Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?

Yu-Gi-Oh cards in Python 3

Traduction de « Life is a roller coaster »

AB diagonalizable then BA also diagonalizable

Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis

If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?

What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?

Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?

What was Carter Burkes job for "the company" in "Aliens"?

New carbon wheel brake pads after use on aluminum wheel?

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?

Can someone explain this formula for calculating Manhattan distance?



What would be the main consequences for a country leaving the WTO?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDoes the WTO itself have any input into trade agreements?Can schedules be bilaterally agreed in the WTO forum?What's Trump frustration with the WTO?Leaving the EU without a deal and MFN rulesHave any prominent Brexiteers argued for the UK to become a duty-free country (like Singapore)?Does the WTO have a concept of “default” or standard tariffs?No-deal Brexit: What would be the basis for a WTO complaint if goods entering Ireland are checked at Dunkirk?Can the UK deal selectively with Ireland post-Brexit without falling afoul of WTO rules?










4















Trump threatened to leave the WTO a while back. (This might be understated, but I won't search how many times he may have said that.)



What I want to ask is: what would be the consequences for a country, big or small, if it just left the WTO? I assume (economic) size might make a difference in outcomes, although I could be wrong on this.



As far as I know there aren't any concrete example of countries who left, but if I'm somehow wrong on this (too), then we could have a concrete example of the consequences. If not, then perhaps we'd have to rely on some published analyses of such WTO-exit scenarios for an answer.










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    @JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

    – Fizz
    1 hour ago















4















Trump threatened to leave the WTO a while back. (This might be understated, but I won't search how many times he may have said that.)



What I want to ask is: what would be the consequences for a country, big or small, if it just left the WTO? I assume (economic) size might make a difference in outcomes, although I could be wrong on this.



As far as I know there aren't any concrete example of countries who left, but if I'm somehow wrong on this (too), then we could have a concrete example of the consequences. If not, then perhaps we'd have to rely on some published analyses of such WTO-exit scenarios for an answer.










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    @JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

    – Fizz
    1 hour ago













4












4








4








Trump threatened to leave the WTO a while back. (This might be understated, but I won't search how many times he may have said that.)



What I want to ask is: what would be the consequences for a country, big or small, if it just left the WTO? I assume (economic) size might make a difference in outcomes, although I could be wrong on this.



As far as I know there aren't any concrete example of countries who left, but if I'm somehow wrong on this (too), then we could have a concrete example of the consequences. If not, then perhaps we'd have to rely on some published analyses of such WTO-exit scenarios for an answer.










share|improve this question














Trump threatened to leave the WTO a while back. (This might be understated, but I won't search how many times he may have said that.)



What I want to ask is: what would be the consequences for a country, big or small, if it just left the WTO? I assume (economic) size might make a difference in outcomes, although I could be wrong on this.



As far as I know there aren't any concrete example of countries who left, but if I'm somehow wrong on this (too), then we could have a concrete example of the consequences. If not, then perhaps we'd have to rely on some published analyses of such WTO-exit scenarios for an answer.







wto






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









FizzFizz

12.8k12981




12.8k12981







  • 1





    @JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

    – Fizz
    1 hour ago












  • 1





    @JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

    – Fizz
    1 hour ago







1




1





@JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

– Fizz
1 hour ago





@JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

– Fizz
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














One way to try to answer this is to look at the benefits of the WTO. The main two are Most Favored Nation and National Treatment:



  • Most Favored Nation basically says that if you lower a trade barrier for one nation you have to do the same for the others.


  • National Treatment basically means that you can't discriminate between locally produced goods and foreign goods. I'm not privy with the details but I'd spitball this is related to not favoring local businesses in government contracts, or at least not in broad daylight.


Conversely, if you were to leave the WTO, it would mean that your existing trading partners can now:



  • Lower trade barriers with other WTO members without lowering them for you; and increase trade barriers on you.


  • Favor their own local producers, and those of other WTO members, in lieu of yours.


A third benefit that you'd lose is the well oiled dispute resolution mechanism. Going forward you'd need to go negotiate arbitration clauses and put language to that effect in each trade treaty. Which I would imagine is not a big deal in practice. It would probably carry less predictable outcomes, but at the same time it could end up benefitting you on average if you're the 800 pound gorilla in the room.



A fourth benefit might also be that WTO members don't seem to go to war with one another very often. (They do impose sanctions on each other from time to time, though -- e.g. Russia.)



As to what would be the practical benefit for any country, in terms of economic damage, it would depend on the country and it's frankly anyone's guess.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "475"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40081%2fwhat-would-be-the-main-consequences-for-a-country-leaving-the-wto%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    One way to try to answer this is to look at the benefits of the WTO. The main two are Most Favored Nation and National Treatment:



    • Most Favored Nation basically says that if you lower a trade barrier for one nation you have to do the same for the others.


    • National Treatment basically means that you can't discriminate between locally produced goods and foreign goods. I'm not privy with the details but I'd spitball this is related to not favoring local businesses in government contracts, or at least not in broad daylight.


    Conversely, if you were to leave the WTO, it would mean that your existing trading partners can now:



    • Lower trade barriers with other WTO members without lowering them for you; and increase trade barriers on you.


    • Favor their own local producers, and those of other WTO members, in lieu of yours.


    A third benefit that you'd lose is the well oiled dispute resolution mechanism. Going forward you'd need to go negotiate arbitration clauses and put language to that effect in each trade treaty. Which I would imagine is not a big deal in practice. It would probably carry less predictable outcomes, but at the same time it could end up benefitting you on average if you're the 800 pound gorilla in the room.



    A fourth benefit might also be that WTO members don't seem to go to war with one another very often. (They do impose sanctions on each other from time to time, though -- e.g. Russia.)



    As to what would be the practical benefit for any country, in terms of economic damage, it would depend on the country and it's frankly anyone's guess.






    share|improve this answer





























      2














      One way to try to answer this is to look at the benefits of the WTO. The main two are Most Favored Nation and National Treatment:



      • Most Favored Nation basically says that if you lower a trade barrier for one nation you have to do the same for the others.


      • National Treatment basically means that you can't discriminate between locally produced goods and foreign goods. I'm not privy with the details but I'd spitball this is related to not favoring local businesses in government contracts, or at least not in broad daylight.


      Conversely, if you were to leave the WTO, it would mean that your existing trading partners can now:



      • Lower trade barriers with other WTO members without lowering them for you; and increase trade barriers on you.


      • Favor their own local producers, and those of other WTO members, in lieu of yours.


      A third benefit that you'd lose is the well oiled dispute resolution mechanism. Going forward you'd need to go negotiate arbitration clauses and put language to that effect in each trade treaty. Which I would imagine is not a big deal in practice. It would probably carry less predictable outcomes, but at the same time it could end up benefitting you on average if you're the 800 pound gorilla in the room.



      A fourth benefit might also be that WTO members don't seem to go to war with one another very often. (They do impose sanctions on each other from time to time, though -- e.g. Russia.)



      As to what would be the practical benefit for any country, in terms of economic damage, it would depend on the country and it's frankly anyone's guess.






      share|improve this answer



























        2












        2








        2







        One way to try to answer this is to look at the benefits of the WTO. The main two are Most Favored Nation and National Treatment:



        • Most Favored Nation basically says that if you lower a trade barrier for one nation you have to do the same for the others.


        • National Treatment basically means that you can't discriminate between locally produced goods and foreign goods. I'm not privy with the details but I'd spitball this is related to not favoring local businesses in government contracts, or at least not in broad daylight.


        Conversely, if you were to leave the WTO, it would mean that your existing trading partners can now:



        • Lower trade barriers with other WTO members without lowering them for you; and increase trade barriers on you.


        • Favor their own local producers, and those of other WTO members, in lieu of yours.


        A third benefit that you'd lose is the well oiled dispute resolution mechanism. Going forward you'd need to go negotiate arbitration clauses and put language to that effect in each trade treaty. Which I would imagine is not a big deal in practice. It would probably carry less predictable outcomes, but at the same time it could end up benefitting you on average if you're the 800 pound gorilla in the room.



        A fourth benefit might also be that WTO members don't seem to go to war with one another very often. (They do impose sanctions on each other from time to time, though -- e.g. Russia.)



        As to what would be the practical benefit for any country, in terms of economic damage, it would depend on the country and it's frankly anyone's guess.






        share|improve this answer















        One way to try to answer this is to look at the benefits of the WTO. The main two are Most Favored Nation and National Treatment:



        • Most Favored Nation basically says that if you lower a trade barrier for one nation you have to do the same for the others.


        • National Treatment basically means that you can't discriminate between locally produced goods and foreign goods. I'm not privy with the details but I'd spitball this is related to not favoring local businesses in government contracts, or at least not in broad daylight.


        Conversely, if you were to leave the WTO, it would mean that your existing trading partners can now:



        • Lower trade barriers with other WTO members without lowering them for you; and increase trade barriers on you.


        • Favor their own local producers, and those of other WTO members, in lieu of yours.


        A third benefit that you'd lose is the well oiled dispute resolution mechanism. Going forward you'd need to go negotiate arbitration clauses and put language to that effect in each trade treaty. Which I would imagine is not a big deal in practice. It would probably carry less predictable outcomes, but at the same time it could end up benefitting you on average if you're the 800 pound gorilla in the room.



        A fourth benefit might also be that WTO members don't seem to go to war with one another very often. (They do impose sanctions on each other from time to time, though -- e.g. Russia.)



        As to what would be the practical benefit for any country, in terms of economic damage, it would depend on the country and it's frankly anyone's guess.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 1 hour ago

























        answered 1 hour ago









        Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

        13.9k33860




        13.9k33860



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40081%2fwhat-would-be-the-main-consequences-for-a-country-leaving-the-wto%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            बाताम इन्हें भी देखें सन्दर्भ दिक्चालन सूची1°05′00″N 104°02′0″E / 1.08333°N 104.03333°E / 1.08333; 104.033331°05′00″N 104°02′0″E / 1.08333°N 104.03333°E / 1.08333; 104.03333

            Why is the 'in' operator throwing an error with a string literal instead of logging false?Why can't I use switch statement on a String?Python join: why is it string.join(list) instead of list.join(string)?Multiline String Literal in C#Why does comparing strings using either '==' or 'is' sometimes produce a different result?How to initialize an array's length in javascript?How can I print literal curly-brace characters in python string and also use .format on it?Why does ++[[]][+[]]+[+[]] return the string “10”?Why is char[] preferred over String for passwords?Why does this code using random strings print “hello world”?jQuery.inArray(), how to use it right?

            How can we generalize the fact of finite dimensional vector space to an infinte dimensional case?$k[x]$-module and cyclic module over a finite dimensional vector spaceSubspace of a finite dimensional space is finite dimensionalIf V is an infinite-dimensional vector space, and S is an infinite-dimensional subspace of V, must the dimension of V/S be finite? ExplainWhy is an infinite dimensional space so different than a finite dimensional one?base for finite dimensional vector space is not infinite dimensional vector space?Any finite-dimensional vector space is the dual space of anotherHaving Trouble Understanding Meaning Of A Finite-Dimensional Vector SpaceProve that “Every subspaces of a finite-dimensional vector space is finite-dimensional”Ring as a finite dimensional Vector space over a field KQuestion regarding basis and dimension