How can you use ICE tables to solve multiple coupled equilibria?How to calculate the concentration of all relevant species in a buffer of a given pH?Determining equilibrium concentrations from initial conditions and equilibrium constantDetermining solubility of silver sulfate in its saturated solutionIs LiOH a weaker base than NaOH?What's the Kp value?Equilibrium Bond Dissociationice tables equilibirium qConfusion about the ICE tableHow do I find the theoretical pH of a buffer solution after HCl and NaOH were added, separately?Q. 36 2018 molar solubility of CaF2 at pH3 given molar solubility at pH7 and pKa of HF

how to write formula in word in latex

Why did it take so long to abandon sail after steamships were demonstrated?

What options are left, if Britain cannot decide?

In a future war, an old lady is trying to raise a boy but one of the weapons has made everyone deaf

Is a party consisting of only a bard, a cleric, and a warlock functional long-term?

Time travel from stationary position?

How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?

Are all passive ability checks floors for active ability checks?

Use void Apex method in Lightning Web Component

Official degrees of earth’s rotation per day

Opacity of an object in 2.8

Can I use USB data pins as power source

Welcoming 2019 Pi day: How to draw the letter π?

how to draw discrete time diagram in tikz

Is it true that good novels will automatically sell themselves on Amazon (and so on) and there is no need for one to waste time promoting?

How to deal with taxi scam when on vacation?

Could the Saturn V actually have launched astronauts around Venus?

Stiffness of a cantilever beam

What's the meaning of “spike” in the context of “adrenaline spike”?

Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work

Co-worker team leader wants to inject his friend's awful software into our development. What should I say to our common boss?

What is the rarity of this homebrew magic staff?

What exactly is this small puffer fish doing and how did it manage to accomplish such a feat?

Who is flying the vertibirds?



How can you use ICE tables to solve multiple coupled equilibria?


How to calculate the concentration of all relevant species in a buffer of a given pH?Determining equilibrium concentrations from initial conditions and equilibrium constantDetermining solubility of silver sulfate in its saturated solutionIs LiOH a weaker base than NaOH?What's the Kp value?Equilibrium Bond Dissociationice tables equilibirium qConfusion about the ICE tableHow do I find the theoretical pH of a buffer solution after HCl and NaOH were added, separately?Q. 36 2018 molar solubility of CaF2 at pH3 given molar solubility at pH7 and pKa of HF













3












$begingroup$


If I have a problem involving multiple coupled equilibrium reactions, such as




Calcium fluoride, $ceCaF2$, has a molar solubility of $pu2.1e−4 mol L−1$ at pH = 7.00. By what factor does its molar solubility increase in a solution with pH = 3.00? The p$K_mathrma$ of $ceHF$ is 3.17.




The relevant reactions are:



$$ceCaF2(s) <=> Ca^2+(aq) + 2 F-(aq)$$ and
$$ceHF(aq) <=> H+(aq) + F-(aq)$$



They are coupled because fluoride occurs in both of them.



Is there a way to use ICE tables to organize the information (stoichiometry, initial concentrations, mass balance) as a way to solve the problem?



For example, I could try to set up one ICE table for each reaction (the column for $ceH+$ is strange because in the problem, the pH is set to a value through an unspecified mechanism):



$$
beginarrayc
hline
&[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] \
hline
I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 \
hline
C & +x & +2x \
hline
E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x \
hline
endarray
$$



and



$$
beginarrayc
hline
&[ceHF] & [ceH+] & [ceF-] \
hline
I & 0 & textN/A & pu4.2e−4 \
hline
C & +x &textN/A & -x \
hline
E & +x & 10^-3.00 & pu4.2e−4 - x\
hline
endarray
$$



However, how do the fluoride concentrations "talk to each other" in the two tables? Is the $x$ in one table the same as the $x$ in the other table?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    If I have a problem involving multiple coupled equilibrium reactions, such as




    Calcium fluoride, $ceCaF2$, has a molar solubility of $pu2.1e−4 mol L−1$ at pH = 7.00. By what factor does its molar solubility increase in a solution with pH = 3.00? The p$K_mathrma$ of $ceHF$ is 3.17.




    The relevant reactions are:



    $$ceCaF2(s) <=> Ca^2+(aq) + 2 F-(aq)$$ and
    $$ceHF(aq) <=> H+(aq) + F-(aq)$$



    They are coupled because fluoride occurs in both of them.



    Is there a way to use ICE tables to organize the information (stoichiometry, initial concentrations, mass balance) as a way to solve the problem?



    For example, I could try to set up one ICE table for each reaction (the column for $ceH+$ is strange because in the problem, the pH is set to a value through an unspecified mechanism):



    $$
    beginarrayc
    hline
    &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] \
    hline
    I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 \
    hline
    C & +x & +2x \
    hline
    E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x \
    hline
    endarray
    $$



    and



    $$
    beginarrayc
    hline
    &[ceHF] & [ceH+] & [ceF-] \
    hline
    I & 0 & textN/A & pu4.2e−4 \
    hline
    C & +x &textN/A & -x \
    hline
    E & +x & 10^-3.00 & pu4.2e−4 - x\
    hline
    endarray
    $$



    However, how do the fluoride concentrations "talk to each other" in the two tables? Is the $x$ in one table the same as the $x$ in the other table?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      If I have a problem involving multiple coupled equilibrium reactions, such as




      Calcium fluoride, $ceCaF2$, has a molar solubility of $pu2.1e−4 mol L−1$ at pH = 7.00. By what factor does its molar solubility increase in a solution with pH = 3.00? The p$K_mathrma$ of $ceHF$ is 3.17.




      The relevant reactions are:



      $$ceCaF2(s) <=> Ca^2+(aq) + 2 F-(aq)$$ and
      $$ceHF(aq) <=> H+(aq) + F-(aq)$$



      They are coupled because fluoride occurs in both of them.



      Is there a way to use ICE tables to organize the information (stoichiometry, initial concentrations, mass balance) as a way to solve the problem?



      For example, I could try to set up one ICE table for each reaction (the column for $ceH+$ is strange because in the problem, the pH is set to a value through an unspecified mechanism):



      $$
      beginarrayc
      hline
      &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] \
      hline
      I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 \
      hline
      C & +x & +2x \
      hline
      E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x \
      hline
      endarray
      $$



      and



      $$
      beginarrayc
      hline
      &[ceHF] & [ceH+] & [ceF-] \
      hline
      I & 0 & textN/A & pu4.2e−4 \
      hline
      C & +x &textN/A & -x \
      hline
      E & +x & 10^-3.00 & pu4.2e−4 - x\
      hline
      endarray
      $$



      However, how do the fluoride concentrations "talk to each other" in the two tables? Is the $x$ in one table the same as the $x$ in the other table?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      If I have a problem involving multiple coupled equilibrium reactions, such as




      Calcium fluoride, $ceCaF2$, has a molar solubility of $pu2.1e−4 mol L−1$ at pH = 7.00. By what factor does its molar solubility increase in a solution with pH = 3.00? The p$K_mathrma$ of $ceHF$ is 3.17.




      The relevant reactions are:



      $$ceCaF2(s) <=> Ca^2+(aq) + 2 F-(aq)$$ and
      $$ceHF(aq) <=> H+(aq) + F-(aq)$$



      They are coupled because fluoride occurs in both of them.



      Is there a way to use ICE tables to organize the information (stoichiometry, initial concentrations, mass balance) as a way to solve the problem?



      For example, I could try to set up one ICE table for each reaction (the column for $ceH+$ is strange because in the problem, the pH is set to a value through an unspecified mechanism):



      $$
      beginarrayc
      hline
      &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] \
      hline
      I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 \
      hline
      C & +x & +2x \
      hline
      E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x \
      hline
      endarray
      $$



      and



      $$
      beginarrayc
      hline
      &[ceHF] & [ceH+] & [ceF-] \
      hline
      I & 0 & textN/A & pu4.2e−4 \
      hline
      C & +x &textN/A & -x \
      hline
      E & +x & 10^-3.00 & pu4.2e−4 - x\
      hline
      endarray
      $$



      However, how do the fluoride concentrations "talk to each other" in the two tables? Is the $x$ in one table the same as the $x$ in the other table?







      equilibrium






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      Mathew Mahindaratne

      3,870318




      3,870318










      asked 4 hours ago









      Karsten TheisKarsten Theis

      2,700434




      2,700434




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.



          Here is the combined ICE table:



          $$
          beginarray
          hline
          &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
          hline
          I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 & textN/A & 0 \
          hline
          C & +x & +2x-y & textN/A & +y \
          hline
          E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x-y & 10^-3.00 & +y \
          hline
          endarray
          $$



          Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.



          What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.



          Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):



          $$
          beginarray
          hline
          &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
          hline
          I & 0 & 0 & textN/A & 0 \
          hline
          C & +p & +2p-q & textN/A & +q \
          hline
          E & +p & +2p-q & 10^-3.00 & +q \
          hline
          endarray
          $$






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "431"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f111041%2fhow-can-you-use-ice-tables-to-solve-multiple-coupled-equilibria%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5












            $begingroup$

            The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.



            Here is the combined ICE table:



            $$
            beginarray
            hline
            &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
            hline
            I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 & textN/A & 0 \
            hline
            C & +x & +2x-y & textN/A & +y \
            hline
            E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x-y & 10^-3.00 & +y \
            hline
            endarray
            $$



            Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.



            What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.



            Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):



            $$
            beginarray
            hline
            &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
            hline
            I & 0 & 0 & textN/A & 0 \
            hline
            C & +p & +2p-q & textN/A & +q \
            hline
            E & +p & +2p-q & 10^-3.00 & +q \
            hline
            endarray
            $$






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              5












              $begingroup$

              The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.



              Here is the combined ICE table:



              $$
              beginarray
              hline
              &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
              hline
              I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 & textN/A & 0 \
              hline
              C & +x & +2x-y & textN/A & +y \
              hline
              E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x-y & 10^-3.00 & +y \
              hline
              endarray
              $$



              Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.



              What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.



              Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):



              $$
              beginarray
              hline
              &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
              hline
              I & 0 & 0 & textN/A & 0 \
              hline
              C & +p & +2p-q & textN/A & +q \
              hline
              E & +p & +2p-q & 10^-3.00 & +q \
              hline
              endarray
              $$






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                5












                5








                5





                $begingroup$

                The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.



                Here is the combined ICE table:



                $$
                beginarray
                hline
                &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
                hline
                I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 & textN/A & 0 \
                hline
                C & +x & +2x-y & textN/A & +y \
                hline
                E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x-y & 10^-3.00 & +y \
                hline
                endarray
                $$



                Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.



                What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.



                Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):



                $$
                beginarray
                hline
                &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
                hline
                I & 0 & 0 & textN/A & 0 \
                hline
                C & +p & +2p-q & textN/A & +q \
                hline
                E & +p & +2p-q & 10^-3.00 & +q \
                hline
                endarray
                $$






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.



                Here is the combined ICE table:



                $$
                beginarray
                hline
                &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
                hline
                I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 & textN/A & 0 \
                hline
                C & +x & +2x-y & textN/A & +y \
                hline
                E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x-y & 10^-3.00 & +y \
                hline
                endarray
                $$



                Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.



                What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.



                Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):



                $$
                beginarray
                hline
                &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
                hline
                I & 0 & 0 & textN/A & 0 \
                hline
                C & +p & +2p-q & textN/A & +q \
                hline
                E & +p & +2p-q & 10^-3.00 & +q \
                hline
                endarray
                $$







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 1 hour ago









                Mathew Mahindaratne

                3,870318




                3,870318










                answered 4 hours ago









                Karsten TheisKarsten Theis

                2,700434




                2,700434



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f111041%2fhow-can-you-use-ice-tables-to-solve-multiple-coupled-equilibria%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    बाताम इन्हें भी देखें सन्दर्भ दिक्चालन सूची1°05′00″N 104°02′0″E / 1.08333°N 104.03333°E / 1.08333; 104.033331°05′00″N 104°02′0″E / 1.08333°N 104.03333°E / 1.08333; 104.03333

                    Why is the 'in' operator throwing an error with a string literal instead of logging false?Why can't I use switch statement on a String?Python join: why is it string.join(list) instead of list.join(string)?Multiline String Literal in C#Why does comparing strings using either '==' or 'is' sometimes produce a different result?How to initialize an array's length in javascript?How can I print literal curly-brace characters in python string and also use .format on it?Why does ++[[]][+[]]+[+[]] return the string “10”?Why is char[] preferred over String for passwords?Why does this code using random strings print “hello world”?jQuery.inArray(), how to use it right?

                    How can we generalize the fact of finite dimensional vector space to an infinte dimensional case?$k[x]$-module and cyclic module over a finite dimensional vector spaceSubspace of a finite dimensional space is finite dimensionalIf V is an infinite-dimensional vector space, and S is an infinite-dimensional subspace of V, must the dimension of V/S be finite? ExplainWhy is an infinite dimensional space so different than a finite dimensional one?base for finite dimensional vector space is not infinite dimensional vector space?Any finite-dimensional vector space is the dual space of anotherHaving Trouble Understanding Meaning Of A Finite-Dimensional Vector SpaceProve that “Every subspaces of a finite-dimensional vector space is finite-dimensional”Ring as a finite dimensional Vector space over a field KQuestion regarding basis and dimension