Getting the current timestamp and compute the timestamp difference in minutesDetermining how long ago a page was last editedDate Format providerHave I coded this small object grouping script Pythonically?Get the difference between two dates, in the most convenient unitConverting UTC time to date in d3Simple elapsed time counterPulling time and date from the internetConvert FoxPro/dBase DATETIME field to Win32 SYSTEMTIME structGetting current timezoneA portable cross platform C++17 method to retrieve the current date and time
Is a party consisting of only a bard, a cleric, and a warlock functional long-term?
How can I track script which gives me "command not found" right after the login?
Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work
What are substitutions for coconut in curry?
How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?
Do I need to be arrogant to get ahead?
What did Alexander Pope mean by "Expletives their feeble Aid do join"?
Do I need life insurance if I can cover my own funeral costs?
Do the common programs (for example: "ls", "cat") in Linux and BSD come from the same source code?
Define, (actually define) the "stability" and "energy" of a compound
Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats
Are there verbs that are neither telic, or atelic?
Min function accepting varying number of arguments in C++17
Why doesn't the EU now just force the UK to choose between referendum and no-deal?
A sequence that has integer values for prime indexes only:
Should we release the security issues we found in our product as CVE or we can just update those on weekly release notes?
It's a yearly task, alright
Why Choose Less Effective Armour Types?
Unexpected result from ArcLength
How to make healing in an exploration game interesting
Happy pi day, everyone!
Hacking a Safe Lock after 3 tries
Can I use USB data pins as power source
Instead of Universal Basic Income, why not Universal Basic NEEDS?
Getting the current timestamp and compute the timestamp difference in minutes
Determining how long ago a page was last editedDate Format providerHave I coded this small object grouping script Pythonically?Get the difference between two dates, in the most convenient unitConverting UTC time to date in d3Simple elapsed time counterPulling time and date from the internetConvert FoxPro/dBase DATETIME field to Win32 SYSTEMTIME structGetting current timezoneA portable cross platform C++17 method to retrieve the current date and time
$begingroup$
I have this code to get the current Timestamp and compute the last timestamp's difference with the current timestamp in minutes. I'm wondering if this can be optimized further for production.
public static Timestamp getTimestamp()
java.util.Date date= new java.util.Date();
long time = date.getTime();
java.sql.Timestamp ts = new java.sql.Timestamp(time);
return ts;
public static long getLastTimestampElapse(java.sql.Timestamp oldTime)
long milliseconds1 = oldTime.getTime();
long milliseconds2 = getTimestamp().getTime();
long diff = milliseconds2 - milliseconds1;
long diffMinutes = diff / (60 * 1000);
return diffMinutes;
java performance datetime
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have this code to get the current Timestamp and compute the last timestamp's difference with the current timestamp in minutes. I'm wondering if this can be optimized further for production.
public static Timestamp getTimestamp()
java.util.Date date= new java.util.Date();
long time = date.getTime();
java.sql.Timestamp ts = new java.sql.Timestamp(time);
return ts;
public static long getLastTimestampElapse(java.sql.Timestamp oldTime)
long milliseconds1 = oldTime.getTime();
long milliseconds2 = getTimestamp().getTime();
long diff = milliseconds2 - milliseconds1;
long diffMinutes = diff / (60 * 1000);
return diffMinutes;
java performance datetime
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have this code to get the current Timestamp and compute the last timestamp's difference with the current timestamp in minutes. I'm wondering if this can be optimized further for production.
public static Timestamp getTimestamp()
java.util.Date date= new java.util.Date();
long time = date.getTime();
java.sql.Timestamp ts = new java.sql.Timestamp(time);
return ts;
public static long getLastTimestampElapse(java.sql.Timestamp oldTime)
long milliseconds1 = oldTime.getTime();
long milliseconds2 = getTimestamp().getTime();
long diff = milliseconds2 - milliseconds1;
long diffMinutes = diff / (60 * 1000);
return diffMinutes;
java performance datetime
$endgroup$
I have this code to get the current Timestamp and compute the last timestamp's difference with the current timestamp in minutes. I'm wondering if this can be optimized further for production.
public static Timestamp getTimestamp()
java.util.Date date= new java.util.Date();
long time = date.getTime();
java.sql.Timestamp ts = new java.sql.Timestamp(time);
return ts;
public static long getLastTimestampElapse(java.sql.Timestamp oldTime)
long milliseconds1 = oldTime.getTime();
long milliseconds2 = getTimestamp().getTime();
long diff = milliseconds2 - milliseconds1;
long diffMinutes = diff / (60 * 1000);
return diffMinutes;
java performance datetime
java performance datetime
edited 11 mins ago
Jamal♦
30.4k11121227
30.4k11121227
asked yesterday
RanPaulRanPaul
3902513
3902513
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that none of these suggestions will have any significant impact on the performance of your application overall. Don't micro-optimize performance until you have known, tested bottlenecks.
The getTimestamp()
method is noise. If all you care about is the current timestamp in milliseconds, use System.currentTimeMillis()
.
You can use a constant to store the number of milliseconds in a minute, potentially saving the multiplication. Even if the compiler optimizes the math away, it's easier to read.
A java.sql.Timestamp
is a kind of java.util.Date
, and the getTime()
method is defined there. Your method should accept a java.util.Date
to support more clients at no cost.
Your method is poorly named. Something like getMinutesSince()
would be more readable. Likewise, there are better variable names than what you've selected.
Use final
to indicate that variables won't be reassigned. That reduces the cognitive load on the reader.
You don't really need as many variables as you have. You might even be able to get away with none and still have a reasonably clear method.
If you were to use all my suggestions, your code might look more like:
private static final long MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE = 60 * 1000;
public static long getMinutesSince(final java.util.Date startTime)
final long millisecondsSinceStart =
System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime.getTime();
return millisecondsSinceStart / MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE;
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You might want to assignMILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE
to something. :-)
$endgroup$
– AJNeufeld
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toMinutes(millisecondsSinceStart) - TimeUnit already has constants for you
$endgroup$
– Alexey Ragozin
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AJNeufeld That's what I get for editing directly in the window instead of moving to my editor. Fixed, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Eric Stein
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexeyRagozin That's a good point. I personally find it harder to read in this case, but it's a good option for the OP to be aware of. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Eric Stein
13 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215432%2fgetting-the-current-timestamp-and-compute-the-timestamp-difference-in-minutes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that none of these suggestions will have any significant impact on the performance of your application overall. Don't micro-optimize performance until you have known, tested bottlenecks.
The getTimestamp()
method is noise. If all you care about is the current timestamp in milliseconds, use System.currentTimeMillis()
.
You can use a constant to store the number of milliseconds in a minute, potentially saving the multiplication. Even if the compiler optimizes the math away, it's easier to read.
A java.sql.Timestamp
is a kind of java.util.Date
, and the getTime()
method is defined there. Your method should accept a java.util.Date
to support more clients at no cost.
Your method is poorly named. Something like getMinutesSince()
would be more readable. Likewise, there are better variable names than what you've selected.
Use final
to indicate that variables won't be reassigned. That reduces the cognitive load on the reader.
You don't really need as many variables as you have. You might even be able to get away with none and still have a reasonably clear method.
If you were to use all my suggestions, your code might look more like:
private static final long MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE = 60 * 1000;
public static long getMinutesSince(final java.util.Date startTime)
final long millisecondsSinceStart =
System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime.getTime();
return millisecondsSinceStart / MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE;
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You might want to assignMILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE
to something. :-)
$endgroup$
– AJNeufeld
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toMinutes(millisecondsSinceStart) - TimeUnit already has constants for you
$endgroup$
– Alexey Ragozin
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AJNeufeld That's what I get for editing directly in the window instead of moving to my editor. Fixed, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Eric Stein
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexeyRagozin That's a good point. I personally find it harder to read in this case, but it's a good option for the OP to be aware of. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Eric Stein
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that none of these suggestions will have any significant impact on the performance of your application overall. Don't micro-optimize performance until you have known, tested bottlenecks.
The getTimestamp()
method is noise. If all you care about is the current timestamp in milliseconds, use System.currentTimeMillis()
.
You can use a constant to store the number of milliseconds in a minute, potentially saving the multiplication. Even if the compiler optimizes the math away, it's easier to read.
A java.sql.Timestamp
is a kind of java.util.Date
, and the getTime()
method is defined there. Your method should accept a java.util.Date
to support more clients at no cost.
Your method is poorly named. Something like getMinutesSince()
would be more readable. Likewise, there are better variable names than what you've selected.
Use final
to indicate that variables won't be reassigned. That reduces the cognitive load on the reader.
You don't really need as many variables as you have. You might even be able to get away with none and still have a reasonably clear method.
If you were to use all my suggestions, your code might look more like:
private static final long MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE = 60 * 1000;
public static long getMinutesSince(final java.util.Date startTime)
final long millisecondsSinceStart =
System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime.getTime();
return millisecondsSinceStart / MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE;
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You might want to assignMILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE
to something. :-)
$endgroup$
– AJNeufeld
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toMinutes(millisecondsSinceStart) - TimeUnit already has constants for you
$endgroup$
– Alexey Ragozin
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AJNeufeld That's what I get for editing directly in the window instead of moving to my editor. Fixed, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Eric Stein
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexeyRagozin That's a good point. I personally find it harder to read in this case, but it's a good option for the OP to be aware of. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Eric Stein
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that none of these suggestions will have any significant impact on the performance of your application overall. Don't micro-optimize performance until you have known, tested bottlenecks.
The getTimestamp()
method is noise. If all you care about is the current timestamp in milliseconds, use System.currentTimeMillis()
.
You can use a constant to store the number of milliseconds in a minute, potentially saving the multiplication. Even if the compiler optimizes the math away, it's easier to read.
A java.sql.Timestamp
is a kind of java.util.Date
, and the getTime()
method is defined there. Your method should accept a java.util.Date
to support more clients at no cost.
Your method is poorly named. Something like getMinutesSince()
would be more readable. Likewise, there are better variable names than what you've selected.
Use final
to indicate that variables won't be reassigned. That reduces the cognitive load on the reader.
You don't really need as many variables as you have. You might even be able to get away with none and still have a reasonably clear method.
If you were to use all my suggestions, your code might look more like:
private static final long MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE = 60 * 1000;
public static long getMinutesSince(final java.util.Date startTime)
final long millisecondsSinceStart =
System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime.getTime();
return millisecondsSinceStart / MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE;
$endgroup$
Note that none of these suggestions will have any significant impact on the performance of your application overall. Don't micro-optimize performance until you have known, tested bottlenecks.
The getTimestamp()
method is noise. If all you care about is the current timestamp in milliseconds, use System.currentTimeMillis()
.
You can use a constant to store the number of milliseconds in a minute, potentially saving the multiplication. Even if the compiler optimizes the math away, it's easier to read.
A java.sql.Timestamp
is a kind of java.util.Date
, and the getTime()
method is defined there. Your method should accept a java.util.Date
to support more clients at no cost.
Your method is poorly named. Something like getMinutesSince()
would be more readable. Likewise, there are better variable names than what you've selected.
Use final
to indicate that variables won't be reassigned. That reduces the cognitive load on the reader.
You don't really need as many variables as you have. You might even be able to get away with none and still have a reasonably clear method.
If you were to use all my suggestions, your code might look more like:
private static final long MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE = 60 * 1000;
public static long getMinutesSince(final java.util.Date startTime)
final long millisecondsSinceStart =
System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime.getTime();
return millisecondsSinceStart / MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE;
edited 13 hours ago
answered yesterday
Eric SteinEric Stein
4,252613
4,252613
1
$begingroup$
You might want to assignMILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE
to something. :-)
$endgroup$
– AJNeufeld
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toMinutes(millisecondsSinceStart) - TimeUnit already has constants for you
$endgroup$
– Alexey Ragozin
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AJNeufeld That's what I get for editing directly in the window instead of moving to my editor. Fixed, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Eric Stein
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexeyRagozin That's a good point. I personally find it harder to read in this case, but it's a good option for the OP to be aware of. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Eric Stein
13 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You might want to assignMILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE
to something. :-)
$endgroup$
– AJNeufeld
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toMinutes(millisecondsSinceStart) - TimeUnit already has constants for you
$endgroup$
– Alexey Ragozin
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AJNeufeld That's what I get for editing directly in the window instead of moving to my editor. Fixed, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Eric Stein
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexeyRagozin That's a good point. I personally find it harder to read in this case, but it's a good option for the OP to be aware of. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Eric Stein
13 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
You might want to assign
MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE
to something. :-)$endgroup$
– AJNeufeld
yesterday
$begingroup$
You might want to assign
MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE
to something. :-)$endgroup$
– AJNeufeld
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toMinutes(millisecondsSinceStart) - TimeUnit already has constants for you
$endgroup$
– Alexey Ragozin
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toMinutes(millisecondsSinceStart) - TimeUnit already has constants for you
$endgroup$
– Alexey Ragozin
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AJNeufeld That's what I get for editing directly in the window instead of moving to my editor. Fixed, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Eric Stein
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AJNeufeld That's what I get for editing directly in the window instead of moving to my editor. Fixed, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Eric Stein
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexeyRagozin That's a good point. I personally find it harder to read in this case, but it's a good option for the OP to be aware of. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Eric Stein
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexeyRagozin That's a good point. I personally find it harder to read in this case, but it's a good option for the OP to be aware of. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Eric Stein
13 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215432%2fgetting-the-current-timestamp-and-compute-the-timestamp-difference-in-minutes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown