Why would a new[] expression ever invoke a destructor?About constructors/destructors and new/delete operators in C++ for custom objectsDoes delete call the destructor?Overloading operator delete in a base classWhen is %destructor invoked in BISON?Why should C++ programmers minimize use of 'new'?Why is ::operator new[] necessary when ::operator new is enough?Why am I permitted to declare an object with a deleted destructor?Does delete[] deallocate memory in one shot after invoking destructors?Why are non-placement `new` and `delete` built into the language and not just regular functions?Why deallocation function is not called when object constructor throw in a new expression?
Why is the "ls" command showing permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?
How could a planet have erratic days?
Why did the EU agree to delay the Brexit deadline?
Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?
How to say when an application is taking the half of your screen on a computer
Invalid date error by date command
Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?
Calculate sum of polynomial roots
Why is this estimator biased?
How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character
Does the Linux kernel need a file system to run?
Why would a new[] expression ever invoke a destructor?
Does IPv6 have similar concept of network mask?
How can I write humor as character trait?
Quoting Keynes in a lecture
It grows, but water kills it
Non-trope happy ending?
Can a stoichiometric mixture of oxygen and methane exist as a liquid at standard pressure and some (low) temperature?
Electoral considerations aside, what are potential benefits, for the US, of policy changes proposed by the tweet recognizing Golan annexation?
Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank
Limits and Infinite Integration by Parts
A binary search solution to 3Sum
What if you are holding an Iron Flask with a demon inside and walk into Antimagic Field?
User Story breakdown - Technical Task + User Feature
Why would a new[] expression ever invoke a destructor?
About constructors/destructors and new/delete operators in C++ for custom objectsDoes delete call the destructor?Overloading operator delete in a base classWhen is %destructor invoked in BISON?Why should C++ programmers minimize use of 'new'?Why is ::operator new[] necessary when ::operator new is enough?Why am I permitted to declare an object with a deleted destructor?Does delete[] deallocate memory in one shot after invoking destructors?Why are non-placement `new` and `delete` built into the language and not just regular functions?Why deallocation function is not called when object constructor throw in a new expression?
From the C++17 standard (draft here), [expr.new]:
If the new-expression creates an object or an array of objects of class type, access and ambiguity control are done for the allocation function, the deallocation function, and the constructor. If the new-expression creates an array of objects of class type, the destructor is potentially invoked.
Why would new[] invoke a destructor? It's new, after all. It isn't delete.
c++ c++17 new-operator
add a comment |
From the C++17 standard (draft here), [expr.new]:
If the new-expression creates an object or an array of objects of class type, access and ambiguity control are done for the allocation function, the deallocation function, and the constructor. If the new-expression creates an array of objects of class type, the destructor is potentially invoked.
Why would new[] invoke a destructor? It's new, after all. It isn't delete.
c++ c++17 new-operator
add a comment |
From the C++17 standard (draft here), [expr.new]:
If the new-expression creates an object or an array of objects of class type, access and ambiguity control are done for the allocation function, the deallocation function, and the constructor. If the new-expression creates an array of objects of class type, the destructor is potentially invoked.
Why would new[] invoke a destructor? It's new, after all. It isn't delete.
c++ c++17 new-operator
From the C++17 standard (draft here), [expr.new]:
If the new-expression creates an object or an array of objects of class type, access and ambiguity control are done for the allocation function, the deallocation function, and the constructor. If the new-expression creates an array of objects of class type, the destructor is potentially invoked.
Why would new[] invoke a destructor? It's new, after all. It isn't delete.
c++ c++17 new-operator
c++ c++17 new-operator
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
195k35382470
asked 1 hour ago
thbthb
8,66432355
8,66432355
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55307381%2fwhy-would-a-new-expression-ever-invoke-a-destructor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
add a comment |
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
add a comment |
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
edited 1 hour ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
24.4k33281
answered 1 hour ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
103k12215280
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55307381%2fwhy-would-a-new-expression-ever-invoke-a-destructor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown