combinatorics - product rule: the number of ways to stack booksCombinatorics-how many ways to sort books on a shelfNumber of ways to put k identical books onto n shelves, if each shelf gets at least oneHow to solve for the amount of arrangements of books on a shelf?# of ways to place books on shelfCombinatorics and order booksHow many ways to arrange books on a bookshelf?In how many ways I can put books on a shelf when only colour mattersFind the number of ways for choosing 3 books from the shelfStacking math booksHow many ways can you arrange books in a shelf?

Do Iron Man suits sport waste management systems?

Processor speed limited at 0.4 Ghz

Error when overriding validators pipeline to create custom error text

Is this draw by repetition?

What is the difference between NTP and validity in Smith's "Logic: The Laws of Truth"?

Finitely generated matrix groups whose eigenvalues are all algebraic

Dump traffic on routing-instance with a Juniper SRX firewall

Does int main() need a declaration on C++?

How seriously should I take size and weight limits of hand luggage?

Is it possible to get a referendum by a court decision?

Is it possible to create a QR code using text?

What happens if you break a law in another country outside of that country?

Why was Sir Cadogan fired?

Spam email "via" my domain, but SPF record exists

What is the opposite of "eschatology"?

How to compactly explain secondary and tertiary characters without resorting to stereotypes?

Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?

Mathematica command that allows it to read my intentions

How can a day be of 24 hours?

Car headlights in a world without electricity

combinatorics - product rule: the number of ways to stack books

Can a simulacrum "regain" HP by being True Polymorphed into a creature that can do so normally?

How does a dynamic QR code work?

What is the difference between 'contrib' and 'non-free' packages repositories?



combinatorics - product rule: the number of ways to stack books


Combinatorics-how many ways to sort books on a shelfNumber of ways to put k identical books onto n shelves, if each shelf gets at least oneHow to solve for the amount of arrangements of books on a shelf?# of ways to place books on shelfCombinatorics and order booksHow many ways to arrange books on a bookshelf?In how many ways I can put books on a shelf when only colour mattersFind the number of ways for choosing 3 books from the shelfStacking math booksHow many ways can you arrange books in a shelf?













3












$begingroup$


I have difficulty understanding what order means in this task (and in general).



The problem I have:




There are five books on the shelf. How many ways you can stack several
of them (a stack can also consist of one book) if (a) The order of
the books in the stack is not important (b) the order of the books in
the stack is important




Solution for point (a):

we have 5 places in the stack, the book may or may not be lying in it, we'll mark it as 0 and 1. Then, the number of all possible combinations of these $2^5$, and we still need to subtract one case when all zeros, so that $2^5 - 1$.



Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not? I tried to draw for a couple of cases, for example 01010 and 10100. Both these stacks have two books, if the order was not important, it would be one case, not two, right?



For point (b) the correct solution is through the sum of $5 + 5 * 4 + 5 * 4 * 3 + ... + 5!$, where each term is a number of ways to select n books out of 5. But how does it differ from the first one? Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?



Shortly, I'm confused.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    1 hour ago
















3












$begingroup$


I have difficulty understanding what order means in this task (and in general).



The problem I have:




There are five books on the shelf. How many ways you can stack several
of them (a stack can also consist of one book) if (a) The order of
the books in the stack is not important (b) the order of the books in
the stack is important




Solution for point (a):

we have 5 places in the stack, the book may or may not be lying in it, we'll mark it as 0 and 1. Then, the number of all possible combinations of these $2^5$, and we still need to subtract one case when all zeros, so that $2^5 - 1$.



Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not? I tried to draw for a couple of cases, for example 01010 and 10100. Both these stacks have two books, if the order was not important, it would be one case, not two, right?



For point (b) the correct solution is through the sum of $5 + 5 * 4 + 5 * 4 * 3 + ... + 5!$, where each term is a number of ways to select n books out of 5. But how does it differ from the first one? Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?



Shortly, I'm confused.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    1 hour ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$


I have difficulty understanding what order means in this task (and in general).



The problem I have:




There are five books on the shelf. How many ways you can stack several
of them (a stack can also consist of one book) if (a) The order of
the books in the stack is not important (b) the order of the books in
the stack is important




Solution for point (a):

we have 5 places in the stack, the book may or may not be lying in it, we'll mark it as 0 and 1. Then, the number of all possible combinations of these $2^5$, and we still need to subtract one case when all zeros, so that $2^5 - 1$.



Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not? I tried to draw for a couple of cases, for example 01010 and 10100. Both these stacks have two books, if the order was not important, it would be one case, not two, right?



For point (b) the correct solution is through the sum of $5 + 5 * 4 + 5 * 4 * 3 + ... + 5!$, where each term is a number of ways to select n books out of 5. But how does it differ from the first one? Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?



Shortly, I'm confused.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have difficulty understanding what order means in this task (and in general).



The problem I have:




There are five books on the shelf. How many ways you can stack several
of them (a stack can also consist of one book) if (a) The order of
the books in the stack is not important (b) the order of the books in
the stack is important




Solution for point (a):

we have 5 places in the stack, the book may or may not be lying in it, we'll mark it as 0 and 1. Then, the number of all possible combinations of these $2^5$, and we still need to subtract one case when all zeros, so that $2^5 - 1$.



Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not? I tried to draw for a couple of cases, for example 01010 and 10100. Both these stacks have two books, if the order was not important, it would be one case, not two, right?



For point (b) the correct solution is through the sum of $5 + 5 * 4 + 5 * 4 * 3 + ... + 5!$, where each term is a number of ways to select n books out of 5. But how does it differ from the first one? Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?



Shortly, I'm confused.







combinatorics permutations combinations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago







Alexander Nikolin

















asked 2 hours ago









Alexander NikolinAlexander Nikolin

224




224











  • $begingroup$
    If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    1 hour ago

















  • $begingroup$
    If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    1 hour ago
















$begingroup$
If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
1 hour ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$


Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not?




It does not. The reason is that the only thing you have taken into account here are which books to include in the stack. You've gone to each book in order, asked "Do I want this book to be in the stack or not?", gotten a yes / no answer, and that's it. There are $2^5$ different ways that this question round can go, one of those ways does not result in a stack, so there are $2^5 - 1$ different stacks you could make.




Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?




Yes, you considered all possible combinations, but not the fact that a stack could be ordered in many different ways. So while in (a), "a stack of all the books" only made for a single possibility, namely "a stack of all the books", this time there are $5! = 120$ different orders to stack those five books. And similarily for four, three or two books. This naturally leads to more possibilities.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    1 hour ago


















3












$begingroup$

If order matters, then we want to find the number of orders of books in the stack. I am not sure what notation you are familiar with. I will use the binomial coefficient notation. So, depending on which notation you are familiar with:



$$dbinomnr = dfracn!r!(n-r)! = _nC_r = ^nC_r$$



The number of orders is given by:



$$sum_i=1^5 i!dbinom5i$$



What this means is that there are $dbinom51$ way of choosing one book, and $1!$ ways of permuting them. There are $dbinom52$ ways of choosing two books, and $2!$ ways of permuting them. Etc.



So, $1!dbinom51+2!dbinom52+3!dbinom53+4!dbinom54+5!dbinom55 = 325$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    1 hour ago












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171817%2fcombinatorics-product-rule-the-number-of-ways-to-stack-books%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$


Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not?




It does not. The reason is that the only thing you have taken into account here are which books to include in the stack. You've gone to each book in order, asked "Do I want this book to be in the stack or not?", gotten a yes / no answer, and that's it. There are $2^5$ different ways that this question round can go, one of those ways does not result in a stack, so there are $2^5 - 1$ different stacks you could make.




Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?




Yes, you considered all possible combinations, but not the fact that a stack could be ordered in many different ways. So while in (a), "a stack of all the books" only made for a single possibility, namely "a stack of all the books", this time there are $5! = 120$ different orders to stack those five books. And similarily for four, three or two books. This naturally leads to more possibilities.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    1 hour ago















3












$begingroup$


Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not?




It does not. The reason is that the only thing you have taken into account here are which books to include in the stack. You've gone to each book in order, asked "Do I want this book to be in the stack or not?", gotten a yes / no answer, and that's it. There are $2^5$ different ways that this question round can go, one of those ways does not result in a stack, so there are $2^5 - 1$ different stacks you could make.




Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?




Yes, you considered all possible combinations, but not the fact that a stack could be ordered in many different ways. So while in (a), "a stack of all the books" only made for a single possibility, namely "a stack of all the books", this time there are $5! = 120$ different orders to stack those five books. And similarily for four, three or two books. This naturally leads to more possibilities.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    1 hour ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$


Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not?




It does not. The reason is that the only thing you have taken into account here are which books to include in the stack. You've gone to each book in order, asked "Do I want this book to be in the stack or not?", gotten a yes / no answer, and that's it. There are $2^5$ different ways that this question round can go, one of those ways does not result in a stack, so there are $2^5 - 1$ different stacks you could make.




Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?




Yes, you considered all possible combinations, but not the fact that a stack could be ordered in many different ways. So while in (a), "a stack of all the books" only made for a single possibility, namely "a stack of all the books", this time there are $5! = 120$ different orders to stack those five books. And similarily for four, three or two books. This naturally leads to more possibilities.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not?




It does not. The reason is that the only thing you have taken into account here are which books to include in the stack. You've gone to each book in order, asked "Do I want this book to be in the stack or not?", gotten a yes / no answer, and that's it. There are $2^5$ different ways that this question round can go, one of those ways does not result in a stack, so there are $2^5 - 1$ different stacks you could make.




Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?




Yes, you considered all possible combinations, but not the fact that a stack could be ordered in many different ways. So while in (a), "a stack of all the books" only made for a single possibility, namely "a stack of all the books", this time there are $5! = 120$ different orders to stack those five books. And similarily for four, three or two books. This naturally leads to more possibilities.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 2 hours ago









ArthurArthur

121k7122208




121k7122208











  • $begingroup$
    So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    1 hour ago
















  • $begingroup$
    So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    1 hour ago















$begingroup$
So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
1 hour ago











3












$begingroup$

If order matters, then we want to find the number of orders of books in the stack. I am not sure what notation you are familiar with. I will use the binomial coefficient notation. So, depending on which notation you are familiar with:



$$dbinomnr = dfracn!r!(n-r)! = _nC_r = ^nC_r$$



The number of orders is given by:



$$sum_i=1^5 i!dbinom5i$$



What this means is that there are $dbinom51$ way of choosing one book, and $1!$ ways of permuting them. There are $dbinom52$ ways of choosing two books, and $2!$ ways of permuting them. Etc.



So, $1!dbinom51+2!dbinom52+3!dbinom53+4!dbinom54+5!dbinom55 = 325$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    1 hour ago
















3












$begingroup$

If order matters, then we want to find the number of orders of books in the stack. I am not sure what notation you are familiar with. I will use the binomial coefficient notation. So, depending on which notation you are familiar with:



$$dbinomnr = dfracn!r!(n-r)! = _nC_r = ^nC_r$$



The number of orders is given by:



$$sum_i=1^5 i!dbinom5i$$



What this means is that there are $dbinom51$ way of choosing one book, and $1!$ ways of permuting them. There are $dbinom52$ ways of choosing two books, and $2!$ ways of permuting them. Etc.



So, $1!dbinom51+2!dbinom52+3!dbinom53+4!dbinom54+5!dbinom55 = 325$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    1 hour ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$

If order matters, then we want to find the number of orders of books in the stack. I am not sure what notation you are familiar with. I will use the binomial coefficient notation. So, depending on which notation you are familiar with:



$$dbinomnr = dfracn!r!(n-r)! = _nC_r = ^nC_r$$



The number of orders is given by:



$$sum_i=1^5 i!dbinom5i$$



What this means is that there are $dbinom51$ way of choosing one book, and $1!$ ways of permuting them. There are $dbinom52$ ways of choosing two books, and $2!$ ways of permuting them. Etc.



So, $1!dbinom51+2!dbinom52+3!dbinom53+4!dbinom54+5!dbinom55 = 325$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



If order matters, then we want to find the number of orders of books in the stack. I am not sure what notation you are familiar with. I will use the binomial coefficient notation. So, depending on which notation you are familiar with:



$$dbinomnr = dfracn!r!(n-r)! = _nC_r = ^nC_r$$



The number of orders is given by:



$$sum_i=1^5 i!dbinom5i$$



What this means is that there are $dbinom51$ way of choosing one book, and $1!$ ways of permuting them. There are $dbinom52$ ways of choosing two books, and $2!$ ways of permuting them. Etc.



So, $1!dbinom51+2!dbinom52+3!dbinom53+4!dbinom54+5!dbinom55 = 325$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









InterstellarProbeInterstellarProbe

3,154728




3,154728











  • $begingroup$
    Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    1 hour ago

















  • $begingroup$
    Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    1 hour ago
















$begingroup$
Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
1 hour ago




2




2




$begingroup$
$$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
$$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
1 hour ago


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171817%2fcombinatorics-product-rule-the-number-of-ways-to-stack-books%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?Is the laser built in Măgurele, România, the most powerful in the world?Has man walked on the Moon?Did a nuclear blast devastate Port Chicago on July 17, 1944?Is this a true demonstration of using a stove to power a paper airplane?Does the Theradome Laser Helmet deliver around 7 J/cm2 to the head?What formula gives the solunar periods of the Solunar Theory?Can a strong solar storm knock out our power grids for months?Is half of the climate change in the past 110 years due to natural variation in the Sun's output?Does charging a phone use the same power as a washing machine?Is the laser built in Măgurele, România, the most powerful in the world?Do lipid droplets in our skin create a laser?

त्रोत्स्की जीवन परिचय बाहरी कड़ियाँ दिक्चालन सूचीत्रोत्सकी और भारत

आपसी सहायता अनुक्रम प्रतिस्पर्धा और सहयोग आपसी सहायता के पांच सिद्धान्त अमीबा में सहयोग सामाजिक कीट पक्षियों में बच्चों का पालन-पोषण हाथी परिवार नरवानर गण मानव समूह इन्हें भी देखें सन्दर्भ दिक्चालन सूची