Can criminal fraud exist without damages?Security Deposit term (whether it is legal) in Rental Agreement in USCan the Feds not put Bank Executives (or their employees) in Prison for Fraud?Why a civil court can order damages for killing a person?Is there any way to recoup financial damages after spending everything you have on defense and being found innocent?How well can one know the rules in gambling before it's legally fraud?If the damages from a lawsuit force the defendant into bankruptcy, are they forgiven?Does being in DHS custody awaiting criminal prosecution count as “time served”?Can a landlord charge for pet rent without pets?Is Intentional Immaterial Fraud Legal?Would there be any legal risk to informing bank that you have been given an account number your believe is compromised?

If a character can use a +X magic weapon as a spellcasting focus, does it add the bonus to spell attacks or spell save DCs?

What's a natural way to say that someone works somewhere (for a job)?

Print name if parameter passed to function

Is it correct to write "is not focus on"?

How will losing mobility of one hand affect my career as a programmer?

Why does John Bercow say “unlock” after reading out the results of a vote?

MaTeX, font size, and PlotLegends

Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python

Trouble understanding overseas colleagues

Should my PhD thesis be submitted under my legal name?

How do I rename a LINUX host without needing to reboot for the rename to take effect?

Efficiently merge handle parallel feature branches in SFDX

Can I Retrieve Email Addresses from BCC?

How does it work when somebody invests in my business?

There is only s̶i̶x̶t̶y one place he can be

Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?

Where in the Bible does the greeting ("Dominus Vobiscum") used at Mass come from?

Irreducibility of a simple polynomial

when is out of tune ok?

Will it be accepted, if there is no ''Main Character" stereotype?

How can I replace every global instance of "x[2]" with "x_2"

Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm

How to prove that the query oracle is unitary?

What is the oldest known work of fiction?



Can criminal fraud exist without damages?


Security Deposit term (whether it is legal) in Rental Agreement in USCan the Feds not put Bank Executives (or their employees) in Prison for Fraud?Why a civil court can order damages for killing a person?Is there any way to recoup financial damages after spending everything you have on defense and being found innocent?How well can one know the rules in gambling before it's legally fraud?If the damages from a lawsuit force the defendant into bankruptcy, are they forgiven?Does being in DHS custody awaiting criminal prosecution count as “time served”?Can a landlord charge for pet rent without pets?Is Intentional Immaterial Fraud Legal?Would there be any legal risk to informing bank that you have been given an account number your believe is compromised?













2















If I fraud someone, invest their money and pay it back is there any criminal offense? Does fraud require damages? Will most judges realistically treat this a criminal case?










share|improve this question







New contributor




user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • If you rob a bank, spend the money, win the lottery and pay it back, is it still a crime?

    – Ron Beyer
    1 hour ago











  • @RonBeyer your case is different, because the robber has not committed fraud, but theft. And yes, it would still be a crime, even if you pay the money back later.

    – Shazamo Morebucks
    1 hour ago















2















If I fraud someone, invest their money and pay it back is there any criminal offense? Does fraud require damages? Will most judges realistically treat this a criminal case?










share|improve this question







New contributor




user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • If you rob a bank, spend the money, win the lottery and pay it back, is it still a crime?

    – Ron Beyer
    1 hour ago











  • @RonBeyer your case is different, because the robber has not committed fraud, but theft. And yes, it would still be a crime, even if you pay the money back later.

    – Shazamo Morebucks
    1 hour ago













2












2








2








If I fraud someone, invest their money and pay it back is there any criminal offense? Does fraud require damages? Will most judges realistically treat this a criminal case?










share|improve this question







New contributor




user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












If I fraud someone, invest their money and pay it back is there any criminal offense? Does fraud require damages? Will most judges realistically treat this a criminal case?







united-states






share|improve this question







New contributor




user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









user24954user24954

131




131




New contributor




user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • If you rob a bank, spend the money, win the lottery and pay it back, is it still a crime?

    – Ron Beyer
    1 hour ago











  • @RonBeyer your case is different, because the robber has not committed fraud, but theft. And yes, it would still be a crime, even if you pay the money back later.

    – Shazamo Morebucks
    1 hour ago

















  • If you rob a bank, spend the money, win the lottery and pay it back, is it still a crime?

    – Ron Beyer
    1 hour ago











  • @RonBeyer your case is different, because the robber has not committed fraud, but theft. And yes, it would still be a crime, even if you pay the money back later.

    – Shazamo Morebucks
    1 hour ago
















If you rob a bank, spend the money, win the lottery and pay it back, is it still a crime?

– Ron Beyer
1 hour ago





If you rob a bank, spend the money, win the lottery and pay it back, is it still a crime?

– Ron Beyer
1 hour ago













@RonBeyer your case is different, because the robber has not committed fraud, but theft. And yes, it would still be a crime, even if you pay the money back later.

– Shazamo Morebucks
1 hour ago





@RonBeyer your case is different, because the robber has not committed fraud, but theft. And yes, it would still be a crime, even if you pay the money back later.

– Shazamo Morebucks
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














If a person is wrongfully deprived of money (or something else of value) for a period, that damage, even if the money is later repaid. The victim might have used the money in some profitable or advantageous way during the period when it was taken. But the victim need not prove exactly how s/he might have profited, it is enough to show that the victim was wrongfully deprived of something of value.



Of course, there are other elements to fraud. There must have been a lie or deception, on which the victim reasonably relied. There must have been intent that the victim so relay. The deception must have been material and must have directly caused or led to the damage.



But assuming that all the elements of fraud are proved, restitution, even full restitution with interest, does not excuse the fraud.



However, as a practical matter, if offered full restitution on condition of a release or an agreement not to prosecute, many victims will choose to take it, preferring their money back, perhaps with interest, to a legal case, even a winning one.






share|improve this answer






























    1














    You say "criminal fraud", if you mean exactly that, then no, returning the money, or offering even more money, will not be a defense.



    You committed a crime and can be convicted for it even if you gave back more money than the complainant had "lost".



    There may be a case for if someone initiated civil proceedings against you on the basis of fraud, since you can simply pay whatever damages that person may seek, and settle the claim.






    share|improve this answer






















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "617"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      user24954 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38459%2fcan-criminal-fraud-exist-without-damages%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4














      If a person is wrongfully deprived of money (or something else of value) for a period, that damage, even if the money is later repaid. The victim might have used the money in some profitable or advantageous way during the period when it was taken. But the victim need not prove exactly how s/he might have profited, it is enough to show that the victim was wrongfully deprived of something of value.



      Of course, there are other elements to fraud. There must have been a lie or deception, on which the victim reasonably relied. There must have been intent that the victim so relay. The deception must have been material and must have directly caused or led to the damage.



      But assuming that all the elements of fraud are proved, restitution, even full restitution with interest, does not excuse the fraud.



      However, as a practical matter, if offered full restitution on condition of a release or an agreement not to prosecute, many victims will choose to take it, preferring their money back, perhaps with interest, to a legal case, even a winning one.






      share|improve this answer



























        4














        If a person is wrongfully deprived of money (or something else of value) for a period, that damage, even if the money is later repaid. The victim might have used the money in some profitable or advantageous way during the period when it was taken. But the victim need not prove exactly how s/he might have profited, it is enough to show that the victim was wrongfully deprived of something of value.



        Of course, there are other elements to fraud. There must have been a lie or deception, on which the victim reasonably relied. There must have been intent that the victim so relay. The deception must have been material and must have directly caused or led to the damage.



        But assuming that all the elements of fraud are proved, restitution, even full restitution with interest, does not excuse the fraud.



        However, as a practical matter, if offered full restitution on condition of a release or an agreement not to prosecute, many victims will choose to take it, preferring their money back, perhaps with interest, to a legal case, even a winning one.






        share|improve this answer

























          4












          4








          4







          If a person is wrongfully deprived of money (or something else of value) for a period, that damage, even if the money is later repaid. The victim might have used the money in some profitable or advantageous way during the period when it was taken. But the victim need not prove exactly how s/he might have profited, it is enough to show that the victim was wrongfully deprived of something of value.



          Of course, there are other elements to fraud. There must have been a lie or deception, on which the victim reasonably relied. There must have been intent that the victim so relay. The deception must have been material and must have directly caused or led to the damage.



          But assuming that all the elements of fraud are proved, restitution, even full restitution with interest, does not excuse the fraud.



          However, as a practical matter, if offered full restitution on condition of a release or an agreement not to prosecute, many victims will choose to take it, preferring their money back, perhaps with interest, to a legal case, even a winning one.






          share|improve this answer













          If a person is wrongfully deprived of money (or something else of value) for a period, that damage, even if the money is later repaid. The victim might have used the money in some profitable or advantageous way during the period when it was taken. But the victim need not prove exactly how s/he might have profited, it is enough to show that the victim was wrongfully deprived of something of value.



          Of course, there are other elements to fraud. There must have been a lie or deception, on which the victim reasonably relied. There must have been intent that the victim so relay. The deception must have been material and must have directly caused or led to the damage.



          But assuming that all the elements of fraud are proved, restitution, even full restitution with interest, does not excuse the fraud.



          However, as a practical matter, if offered full restitution on condition of a release or an agreement not to prosecute, many victims will choose to take it, preferring their money back, perhaps with interest, to a legal case, even a winning one.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          David SiegelDavid Siegel

          14.7k3058




          14.7k3058





















              1














              You say "criminal fraud", if you mean exactly that, then no, returning the money, or offering even more money, will not be a defense.



              You committed a crime and can be convicted for it even if you gave back more money than the complainant had "lost".



              There may be a case for if someone initiated civil proceedings against you on the basis of fraud, since you can simply pay whatever damages that person may seek, and settle the claim.






              share|improve this answer



























                1














                You say "criminal fraud", if you mean exactly that, then no, returning the money, or offering even more money, will not be a defense.



                You committed a crime and can be convicted for it even if you gave back more money than the complainant had "lost".



                There may be a case for if someone initiated civil proceedings against you on the basis of fraud, since you can simply pay whatever damages that person may seek, and settle the claim.






                share|improve this answer

























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  You say "criminal fraud", if you mean exactly that, then no, returning the money, or offering even more money, will not be a defense.



                  You committed a crime and can be convicted for it even if you gave back more money than the complainant had "lost".



                  There may be a case for if someone initiated civil proceedings against you on the basis of fraud, since you can simply pay whatever damages that person may seek, and settle the claim.






                  share|improve this answer













                  You say "criminal fraud", if you mean exactly that, then no, returning the money, or offering even more money, will not be a defense.



                  You committed a crime and can be convicted for it even if you gave back more money than the complainant had "lost".



                  There may be a case for if someone initiated civil proceedings against you on the basis of fraud, since you can simply pay whatever damages that person may seek, and settle the claim.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  Shazamo MorebucksShazamo Morebucks

                  2,9921827




                  2,9921827




















                      user24954 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      user24954 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      user24954 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      user24954 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38459%2fcan-criminal-fraud-exist-without-damages%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      कुँवर स्रोत दिक्चालन सूची"कुँवर""राणा कुँवरके वंशावली"

                      Why is a white electrical wire connected to 2 black wires?How to wire a light fixture with 3 white wires in box?How should I wire a ceiling fan when there's only three wires in the box?Two white, two black, two ground, and red wire in ceiling box connected to switchWhy is there a white wire connected to multiple black wires in my light box?How to wire a light with two white wires and one black wireReplace light switch connected to a power outlet with dimmer - two black wires to one black and redHow to wire a light with multiple black/white/green wires from the ceiling?Ceiling box has 2 black and white wires but fan/ light only has 1 of eachWhy neutral wire connected to load wire?Switch with 2 black, 2 white, 2 ground and 1 red wire connected to ceiling light and a receptacle?

                      चैत्य भूमि चित्र दीर्घा सन्दर्भ बाहरी कडियाँ दिक्चालन सूची"Chaitya Bhoomi""Chaitya Bhoomi: Statue of Equality in India""Dadar Chaitya Bhoomi: Statue of Equality in India""Ambedkar memorial: Centre okays transfer of Indu Mill land"चैत्यभमि