Unable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrix (2)Unable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrixProblem with Eigenvectors when given a matrix containing approximate numbers and symbolsIs Eigensystem::eivin message a bug?Seemingly wrong eigenvectors for numerical matrix whose elements differ in scale by orders of magnitudeInverse of a 3x3 MatrixConvert, using the Pauli matrices, an $n times m$ matrix of quaternions into a $2 n times 2 m$ matrix with complex entries, and vice versaEigenvalues and eigenvectors of tensorsNo eigenvectors coming for a very simple* matrixUnable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrixBasis for unstable manifold of a matrixDensity map for complex and imaginary parts of eigenvalues on one graph

Why do tuner card drivers fail to build after kernel update to 4.4.0-143-generic?

ERC721: How to get the owned tokens of an address

Adventure Game (text based) in C++

What is the adequate fee for a reveal operation?

What's the meaning of a knight fighting a snail in medieval book illustrations?

Why Choose Less Effective Armour Types?

Why one should not leave fingerprints on bulbs and plugs?

If I can solve Sudoku, can I solve the Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP)? If so, how?

Official degrees of earth’s rotation per day

What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?

How could an airship be repaired midflight?

Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?

Shortcut for setting origin to vertex

Is there a symmetric-key algorithm which we can use for creating a signature?

Most cost effective thermostat setting: consistent temperature vs. lowest temperature possible

Simplify an interface for flexibly applying rules to periods of time

How to deal with taxi scam when on vacation?

The German vowel “a” changes to the English “i”

Do the common programs (for example: "ls", "cat") in Linux and BSD come from the same source code?

Employee lack of ownership

et qui - how do you really understand that kind of phraseology?

As a new Ubuntu desktop 18.04 LTS user, do I need to use ufw for a firewall or is iptables sufficient?

How difficult is it to simply disable/disengage the MCAS on Boeing 737 Max 8 & 9 Aircraft?

Print a physical multiplication table



Unable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrix (2)


Unable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrixProblem with Eigenvectors when given a matrix containing approximate numbers and symbolsIs Eigensystem::eivin message a bug?Seemingly wrong eigenvectors for numerical matrix whose elements differ in scale by orders of magnitudeInverse of a 3x3 MatrixConvert, using the Pauli matrices, an $n times m$ matrix of quaternions into a $2 n times 2 m$ matrix with complex entries, and vice versaEigenvalues and eigenvectors of tensorsNo eigenvectors coming for a very simple* matrixUnable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrixBasis for unstable manifold of a matrixDensity map for complex and imaginary parts of eigenvalues on one graph













2












$begingroup$


I have posted a similar question last year pertaining to this issue. Here's a link to my post together with the solution given: Unable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrix



I have tried the methods in my previous posts but to no avail. Here's the problem: I have the following 3x3 matrix



m = -γ/2, -I*g1, -I*Exp[-I*α]*g3, -I*g1, -(κ1)/2, -I*g2, -I*Exp[I*α]*g3, -I*g2, -(κ2)/2]


where I represents the complex identity Sqrt[-1]. I wish to find the eigenvectors for the matrix for two different alpha values. For α = π/2, simply doing (after manually replacing α with π/2)



Eigenvectors[m, Cubics->True]


Returns the appropriate (albeit long) eigenvectors. Now however, if I change my α to α = π and run



 Eigenvectors[m, Cubics->True]


I am returned with



...Eigenvectors: Unable to find all eigenvectors


Which is the similar issue encountered in the link that I provided above a while ago. I proceed to perform the same fix detailed in that question. Namely



Simplify[Eigenvectors[mchiral /. Complex[0, -1] -> mi, Cubics -> True] /. mi -> -I];


and I am still returned with the same error. Namely



...Eigenvectors: Unable to find all eigenvectors


What is the problem here?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    There is no problem: imgur.com/a/ALdYCou Except that you have some brackets misplaced in the definition of m that I fixed – but check if the form is the desired one.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @corey979 Interesting. I am on version 11.3 for macOS and I do get the error message (even after fixing the brackets).
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    How many times have I advocated for providing the $Version one is using... I'm on 10.4 and there is no problem, as showed. Indeed, there is an error in 11.3. No idea what version the OP is using. Unless he clarifies there is virtually no problem.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @corey979 Apologies but I'm using version 11.3. The error still persists even after the bracket fix. I don't know what the problem is
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    3 hours ago















2












$begingroup$


I have posted a similar question last year pertaining to this issue. Here's a link to my post together with the solution given: Unable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrix



I have tried the methods in my previous posts but to no avail. Here's the problem: I have the following 3x3 matrix



m = -γ/2, -I*g1, -I*Exp[-I*α]*g3, -I*g1, -(κ1)/2, -I*g2, -I*Exp[I*α]*g3, -I*g2, -(κ2)/2]


where I represents the complex identity Sqrt[-1]. I wish to find the eigenvectors for the matrix for two different alpha values. For α = π/2, simply doing (after manually replacing α with π/2)



Eigenvectors[m, Cubics->True]


Returns the appropriate (albeit long) eigenvectors. Now however, if I change my α to α = π and run



 Eigenvectors[m, Cubics->True]


I am returned with



...Eigenvectors: Unable to find all eigenvectors


Which is the similar issue encountered in the link that I provided above a while ago. I proceed to perform the same fix detailed in that question. Namely



Simplify[Eigenvectors[mchiral /. Complex[0, -1] -> mi, Cubics -> True] /. mi -> -I];


and I am still returned with the same error. Namely



...Eigenvectors: Unable to find all eigenvectors


What is the problem here?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    There is no problem: imgur.com/a/ALdYCou Except that you have some brackets misplaced in the definition of m that I fixed – but check if the form is the desired one.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @corey979 Interesting. I am on version 11.3 for macOS and I do get the error message (even after fixing the brackets).
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    How many times have I advocated for providing the $Version one is using... I'm on 10.4 and there is no problem, as showed. Indeed, there is an error in 11.3. No idea what version the OP is using. Unless he clarifies there is virtually no problem.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @corey979 Apologies but I'm using version 11.3. The error still persists even after the bracket fix. I don't know what the problem is
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    3 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


I have posted a similar question last year pertaining to this issue. Here's a link to my post together with the solution given: Unable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrix



I have tried the methods in my previous posts but to no avail. Here's the problem: I have the following 3x3 matrix



m = -γ/2, -I*g1, -I*Exp[-I*α]*g3, -I*g1, -(κ1)/2, -I*g2, -I*Exp[I*α]*g3, -I*g2, -(κ2)/2]


where I represents the complex identity Sqrt[-1]. I wish to find the eigenvectors for the matrix for two different alpha values. For α = π/2, simply doing (after manually replacing α with π/2)



Eigenvectors[m, Cubics->True]


Returns the appropriate (albeit long) eigenvectors. Now however, if I change my α to α = π and run



 Eigenvectors[m, Cubics->True]


I am returned with



...Eigenvectors: Unable to find all eigenvectors


Which is the similar issue encountered in the link that I provided above a while ago. I proceed to perform the same fix detailed in that question. Namely



Simplify[Eigenvectors[mchiral /. Complex[0, -1] -> mi, Cubics -> True] /. mi -> -I];


and I am still returned with the same error. Namely



...Eigenvectors: Unable to find all eigenvectors


What is the problem here?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have posted a similar question last year pertaining to this issue. Here's a link to my post together with the solution given: Unable to evaluate Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for a matrix



I have tried the methods in my previous posts but to no avail. Here's the problem: I have the following 3x3 matrix



m = -γ/2, -I*g1, -I*Exp[-I*α]*g3, -I*g1, -(κ1)/2, -I*g2, -I*Exp[I*α]*g3, -I*g2, -(κ2)/2]


where I represents the complex identity Sqrt[-1]. I wish to find the eigenvectors for the matrix for two different alpha values. For α = π/2, simply doing (after manually replacing α with π/2)



Eigenvectors[m, Cubics->True]


Returns the appropriate (albeit long) eigenvectors. Now however, if I change my α to α = π and run



 Eigenvectors[m, Cubics->True]


I am returned with



...Eigenvectors: Unable to find all eigenvectors


Which is the similar issue encountered in the link that I provided above a while ago. I proceed to perform the same fix detailed in that question. Namely



Simplify[Eigenvectors[mchiral /. Complex[0, -1] -> mi, Cubics -> True] /. mi -> -I];


and I am still returned with the same error. Namely



...Eigenvectors: Unable to find all eigenvectors


What is the problem here?







matrix eigenvalues






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









corey979

20.9k64282




20.9k64282










asked 4 hours ago









kowalskikowalski

1559




1559











  • $begingroup$
    There is no problem: imgur.com/a/ALdYCou Except that you have some brackets misplaced in the definition of m that I fixed – but check if the form is the desired one.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @corey979 Interesting. I am on version 11.3 for macOS and I do get the error message (even after fixing the brackets).
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    How many times have I advocated for providing the $Version one is using... I'm on 10.4 and there is no problem, as showed. Indeed, there is an error in 11.3. No idea what version the OP is using. Unless he clarifies there is virtually no problem.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @corey979 Apologies but I'm using version 11.3. The error still persists even after the bracket fix. I don't know what the problem is
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    There is no problem: imgur.com/a/ALdYCou Except that you have some brackets misplaced in the definition of m that I fixed – but check if the form is the desired one.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @corey979 Interesting. I am on version 11.3 for macOS and I do get the error message (even after fixing the brackets).
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    How many times have I advocated for providing the $Version one is using... I'm on 10.4 and there is no problem, as showed. Indeed, there is an error in 11.3. No idea what version the OP is using. Unless he clarifies there is virtually no problem.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @corey979 Apologies but I'm using version 11.3. The error still persists even after the bracket fix. I don't know what the problem is
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
There is no problem: imgur.com/a/ALdYCou Except that you have some brackets misplaced in the definition of m that I fixed – but check if the form is the desired one.
$endgroup$
– corey979
4 hours ago





$begingroup$
There is no problem: imgur.com/a/ALdYCou Except that you have some brackets misplaced in the definition of m that I fixed – but check if the form is the desired one.
$endgroup$
– corey979
4 hours ago













$begingroup$
@corey979 Interesting. I am on version 11.3 for macOS and I do get the error message (even after fixing the brackets).
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@corey979 Interesting. I am on version 11.3 for macOS and I do get the error message (even after fixing the brackets).
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
How many times have I advocated for providing the $Version one is using... I'm on 10.4 and there is no problem, as showed. Indeed, there is an error in 11.3. No idea what version the OP is using. Unless he clarifies there is virtually no problem.
$endgroup$
– corey979
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
How many times have I advocated for providing the $Version one is using... I'm on 10.4 and there is no problem, as showed. Indeed, there is an error in 11.3. No idea what version the OP is using. Unless he clarifies there is virtually no problem.
$endgroup$
– corey979
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
@corey979 Apologies but I'm using version 11.3. The error still persists even after the bracket fix. I don't know what the problem is
$endgroup$
– kowalski
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@corey979 Apologies but I'm using version 11.3. The error still persists even after the bracket fix. I don't know what the problem is
$endgroup$
– kowalski
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

I have o clue why this did not work. However, this old-fashioned method seems to work



m = 
-γ/2, -I g1, -I Exp[-I α] g3,
-I g1, -(κ1)/2, -I g2,
-I Exp[I α] g3, -I g2, -(κ2)/2
;

a = m /. α -> π;
λ = Eigenvalues[a] // ToRadicals;
U = Flatten[NullSpace[a - # IdentityMatrix[3]] & /@ λ, 1];

Simplify[a.Transpose[U] - Transpose[U].DiagonalMatrix[λ]]



0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The eigenvalues seems to be fine. It's long but it prints. The eigenvectors on the other hand, are still unobtainable. I'm starting to think if this is alpha dependent since it works for pi/2 but not pi. But that's just silly and shouldn't happen
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @kowalski U produced by the code above contains the eigenvectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    3 hours ago










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193391%2funable-to-evaluate-eigenvalues-and-eigenvectors-for-a-matrix-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

I have o clue why this did not work. However, this old-fashioned method seems to work



m = 
-γ/2, -I g1, -I Exp[-I α] g3,
-I g1, -(κ1)/2, -I g2,
-I Exp[I α] g3, -I g2, -(κ2)/2
;

a = m /. α -> π;
λ = Eigenvalues[a] // ToRadicals;
U = Flatten[NullSpace[a - # IdentityMatrix[3]] & /@ λ, 1];

Simplify[a.Transpose[U] - Transpose[U].DiagonalMatrix[λ]]



0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The eigenvalues seems to be fine. It's long but it prints. The eigenvectors on the other hand, are still unobtainable. I'm starting to think if this is alpha dependent since it works for pi/2 but not pi. But that's just silly and shouldn't happen
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @kowalski U produced by the code above contains the eigenvectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    3 hours ago















2












$begingroup$

I have o clue why this did not work. However, this old-fashioned method seems to work



m = 
-γ/2, -I g1, -I Exp[-I α] g3,
-I g1, -(κ1)/2, -I g2,
-I Exp[I α] g3, -I g2, -(κ2)/2
;

a = m /. α -> π;
λ = Eigenvalues[a] // ToRadicals;
U = Flatten[NullSpace[a - # IdentityMatrix[3]] & /@ λ, 1];

Simplify[a.Transpose[U] - Transpose[U].DiagonalMatrix[λ]]



0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The eigenvalues seems to be fine. It's long but it prints. The eigenvectors on the other hand, are still unobtainable. I'm starting to think if this is alpha dependent since it works for pi/2 but not pi. But that's just silly and shouldn't happen
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @kowalski U produced by the code above contains the eigenvectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    3 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$

I have o clue why this did not work. However, this old-fashioned method seems to work



m = 
-γ/2, -I g1, -I Exp[-I α] g3,
-I g1, -(κ1)/2, -I g2,
-I Exp[I α] g3, -I g2, -(κ2)/2
;

a = m /. α -> π;
λ = Eigenvalues[a] // ToRadicals;
U = Flatten[NullSpace[a - # IdentityMatrix[3]] & /@ λ, 1];

Simplify[a.Transpose[U] - Transpose[U].DiagonalMatrix[λ]]



0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



I have o clue why this did not work. However, this old-fashioned method seems to work



m = 
-γ/2, -I g1, -I Exp[-I α] g3,
-I g1, -(κ1)/2, -I g2,
-I Exp[I α] g3, -I g2, -(κ2)/2
;

a = m /. α -> π;
λ = Eigenvalues[a] // ToRadicals;
U = Flatten[NullSpace[a - # IdentityMatrix[3]] & /@ λ, 1];

Simplify[a.Transpose[U] - Transpose[U].DiagonalMatrix[λ]]



0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 3 hours ago

























answered 4 hours ago









Henrik SchumacherHenrik Schumacher

56.7k577157




56.7k577157











  • $begingroup$
    The eigenvalues seems to be fine. It's long but it prints. The eigenvectors on the other hand, are still unobtainable. I'm starting to think if this is alpha dependent since it works for pi/2 but not pi. But that's just silly and shouldn't happen
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @kowalski U produced by the code above contains the eigenvectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    The eigenvalues seems to be fine. It's long but it prints. The eigenvectors on the other hand, are still unobtainable. I'm starting to think if this is alpha dependent since it works for pi/2 but not pi. But that's just silly and shouldn't happen
    $endgroup$
    – kowalski
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @kowalski U produced by the code above contains the eigenvectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
The eigenvalues seems to be fine. It's long but it prints. The eigenvectors on the other hand, are still unobtainable. I'm starting to think if this is alpha dependent since it works for pi/2 but not pi. But that's just silly and shouldn't happen
$endgroup$
– kowalski
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
The eigenvalues seems to be fine. It's long but it prints. The eigenvectors on the other hand, are still unobtainable. I'm starting to think if this is alpha dependent since it works for pi/2 but not pi. But that's just silly and shouldn't happen
$endgroup$
– kowalski
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
@kowalski U produced by the code above contains the eigenvectors.
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@kowalski U produced by the code above contains the eigenvectors.
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
3 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193391%2funable-to-evaluate-eigenvalues-and-eigenvectors-for-a-matrix-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

कुँवर स्रोत दिक्चालन सूची"कुँवर""राणा कुँवरके वंशावली"

Why is a white electrical wire connected to 2 black wires?How to wire a light fixture with 3 white wires in box?How should I wire a ceiling fan when there's only three wires in the box?Two white, two black, two ground, and red wire in ceiling box connected to switchWhy is there a white wire connected to multiple black wires in my light box?How to wire a light with two white wires and one black wireReplace light switch connected to a power outlet with dimmer - two black wires to one black and redHow to wire a light with multiple black/white/green wires from the ceiling?Ceiling box has 2 black and white wires but fan/ light only has 1 of eachWhy neutral wire connected to load wire?Switch with 2 black, 2 white, 2 ground and 1 red wire connected to ceiling light and a receptacle?

चैत्य भूमि चित्र दीर्घा सन्दर्भ बाहरी कडियाँ दिक्चालन सूची"Chaitya Bhoomi""Chaitya Bhoomi: Statue of Equality in India""Dadar Chaitya Bhoomi: Statue of Equality in India""Ambedkar memorial: Centre okays transfer of Indu Mill land"चैत्यभमि