Getting the current timestamp and compute the timestamp difference in minutesDetermining how long ago a page was last editedDate Format providerHave I coded this small object grouping script Pythonically?Get the difference between two dates, in the most convenient unitConverting UTC time to date in d3Simple elapsed time counterPulling time and date from the internetConvert FoxPro/dBase DATETIME field to Win32 SYSTEMTIME structGetting current timezoneA portable cross platform C++17 method to retrieve the current date and time

Is a party consisting of only a bard, a cleric, and a warlock functional long-term?

How can I track script which gives me "command not found" right after the login?

Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work

What are substitutions for coconut in curry?

How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?

Do I need to be arrogant to get ahead?

What did Alexander Pope mean by "Expletives their feeble Aid do join"?

Do I need life insurance if I can cover my own funeral costs?

Do the common programs (for example: "ls", "cat") in Linux and BSD come from the same source code?

Define, (actually define) the "stability" and "energy" of a compound

Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats

Are there verbs that are neither telic, or atelic?

Min function accepting varying number of arguments in C++17

Why doesn't the EU now just force the UK to choose between referendum and no-deal?

A sequence that has integer values for prime indexes only:

Should we release the security issues we found in our product as CVE or we can just update those on weekly release notes?

It's a yearly task, alright

Why Choose Less Effective Armour Types?

Unexpected result from ArcLength

How to make healing in an exploration game interesting

Happy pi day, everyone!

Hacking a Safe Lock after 3 tries

Can I use USB data pins as power source

Instead of Universal Basic Income, why not Universal Basic NEEDS?



Getting the current timestamp and compute the timestamp difference in minutes


Determining how long ago a page was last editedDate Format providerHave I coded this small object grouping script Pythonically?Get the difference between two dates, in the most convenient unitConverting UTC time to date in d3Simple elapsed time counterPulling time and date from the internetConvert FoxPro/dBase DATETIME field to Win32 SYSTEMTIME structGetting current timezoneA portable cross platform C++17 method to retrieve the current date and time













1












$begingroup$


I have this code to get the current Timestamp and compute the last timestamp's difference with the current timestamp in minutes. I'm wondering if this can be optimized further for production.



public static Timestamp getTimestamp() 
java.util.Date date= new java.util.Date();
long time = date.getTime();
java.sql.Timestamp ts = new java.sql.Timestamp(time);
return ts;


public static long getLastTimestampElapse(java.sql.Timestamp oldTime)
long milliseconds1 = oldTime.getTime();
long milliseconds2 = getTimestamp().getTime();
long diff = milliseconds2 - milliseconds1;
long diffMinutes = diff / (60 * 1000);
return diffMinutes;










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    I have this code to get the current Timestamp and compute the last timestamp's difference with the current timestamp in minutes. I'm wondering if this can be optimized further for production.



    public static Timestamp getTimestamp() 
    java.util.Date date= new java.util.Date();
    long time = date.getTime();
    java.sql.Timestamp ts = new java.sql.Timestamp(time);
    return ts;


    public static long getLastTimestampElapse(java.sql.Timestamp oldTime)
    long milliseconds1 = oldTime.getTime();
    long milliseconds2 = getTimestamp().getTime();
    long diff = milliseconds2 - milliseconds1;
    long diffMinutes = diff / (60 * 1000);
    return diffMinutes;










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I have this code to get the current Timestamp and compute the last timestamp's difference with the current timestamp in minutes. I'm wondering if this can be optimized further for production.



      public static Timestamp getTimestamp() 
      java.util.Date date= new java.util.Date();
      long time = date.getTime();
      java.sql.Timestamp ts = new java.sql.Timestamp(time);
      return ts;


      public static long getLastTimestampElapse(java.sql.Timestamp oldTime)
      long milliseconds1 = oldTime.getTime();
      long milliseconds2 = getTimestamp().getTime();
      long diff = milliseconds2 - milliseconds1;
      long diffMinutes = diff / (60 * 1000);
      return diffMinutes;










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have this code to get the current Timestamp and compute the last timestamp's difference with the current timestamp in minutes. I'm wondering if this can be optimized further for production.



      public static Timestamp getTimestamp() 
      java.util.Date date= new java.util.Date();
      long time = date.getTime();
      java.sql.Timestamp ts = new java.sql.Timestamp(time);
      return ts;


      public static long getLastTimestampElapse(java.sql.Timestamp oldTime)
      long milliseconds1 = oldTime.getTime();
      long milliseconds2 = getTimestamp().getTime();
      long diff = milliseconds2 - milliseconds1;
      long diffMinutes = diff / (60 * 1000);
      return diffMinutes;







      java performance datetime






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 11 mins ago









      Jamal

      30.4k11121227




      30.4k11121227










      asked yesterday









      RanPaulRanPaul

      3902513




      3902513




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Note that none of these suggestions will have any significant impact on the performance of your application overall. Don't micro-optimize performance until you have known, tested bottlenecks.



          The getTimestamp() method is noise. If all you care about is the current timestamp in milliseconds, use System.currentTimeMillis().



          You can use a constant to store the number of milliseconds in a minute, potentially saving the multiplication. Even if the compiler optimizes the math away, it's easier to read.



          A java.sql.Timestamp is a kind of java.util.Date, and the getTime() method is defined there. Your method should accept a java.util.Date to support more clients at no cost.



          Your method is poorly named. Something like getMinutesSince() would be more readable. Likewise, there are better variable names than what you've selected.



          Use final to indicate that variables won't be reassigned. That reduces the cognitive load on the reader.



          You don't really need as many variables as you have. You might even be able to get away with none and still have a reasonably clear method.



          If you were to use all my suggestions, your code might look more like:



          private static final long MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE = 60 * 1000;

          public static long getMinutesSince(final java.util.Date startTime)
          final long millisecondsSinceStart =
          System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime.getTime();
          return millisecondsSinceStart / MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE;






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You might want to assign MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE to something. :-)
            $endgroup$
            – AJNeufeld
            yesterday






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toMinutes(millisecondsSinceStart) - TimeUnit already has constants for you
            $endgroup$
            – Alexey Ragozin
            23 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @AJNeufeld That's what I get for editing directly in the window instead of moving to my editor. Fixed, thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Stein
            13 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @AlexeyRagozin That's a good point. I personally find it harder to read in this case, but it's a good option for the OP to be aware of. Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Stein
            13 hours ago










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215432%2fgetting-the-current-timestamp-and-compute-the-timestamp-difference-in-minutes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          Note that none of these suggestions will have any significant impact on the performance of your application overall. Don't micro-optimize performance until you have known, tested bottlenecks.



          The getTimestamp() method is noise. If all you care about is the current timestamp in milliseconds, use System.currentTimeMillis().



          You can use a constant to store the number of milliseconds in a minute, potentially saving the multiplication. Even if the compiler optimizes the math away, it's easier to read.



          A java.sql.Timestamp is a kind of java.util.Date, and the getTime() method is defined there. Your method should accept a java.util.Date to support more clients at no cost.



          Your method is poorly named. Something like getMinutesSince() would be more readable. Likewise, there are better variable names than what you've selected.



          Use final to indicate that variables won't be reassigned. That reduces the cognitive load on the reader.



          You don't really need as many variables as you have. You might even be able to get away with none and still have a reasonably clear method.



          If you were to use all my suggestions, your code might look more like:



          private static final long MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE = 60 * 1000;

          public static long getMinutesSince(final java.util.Date startTime)
          final long millisecondsSinceStart =
          System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime.getTime();
          return millisecondsSinceStart / MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE;






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You might want to assign MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE to something. :-)
            $endgroup$
            – AJNeufeld
            yesterday






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toMinutes(millisecondsSinceStart) - TimeUnit already has constants for you
            $endgroup$
            – Alexey Ragozin
            23 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @AJNeufeld That's what I get for editing directly in the window instead of moving to my editor. Fixed, thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Stein
            13 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @AlexeyRagozin That's a good point. I personally find it harder to read in this case, but it's a good option for the OP to be aware of. Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Stein
            13 hours ago















          3












          $begingroup$

          Note that none of these suggestions will have any significant impact on the performance of your application overall. Don't micro-optimize performance until you have known, tested bottlenecks.



          The getTimestamp() method is noise. If all you care about is the current timestamp in milliseconds, use System.currentTimeMillis().



          You can use a constant to store the number of milliseconds in a minute, potentially saving the multiplication. Even if the compiler optimizes the math away, it's easier to read.



          A java.sql.Timestamp is a kind of java.util.Date, and the getTime() method is defined there. Your method should accept a java.util.Date to support more clients at no cost.



          Your method is poorly named. Something like getMinutesSince() would be more readable. Likewise, there are better variable names than what you've selected.



          Use final to indicate that variables won't be reassigned. That reduces the cognitive load on the reader.



          You don't really need as many variables as you have. You might even be able to get away with none and still have a reasonably clear method.



          If you were to use all my suggestions, your code might look more like:



          private static final long MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE = 60 * 1000;

          public static long getMinutesSince(final java.util.Date startTime)
          final long millisecondsSinceStart =
          System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime.getTime();
          return millisecondsSinceStart / MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE;






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You might want to assign MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE to something. :-)
            $endgroup$
            – AJNeufeld
            yesterday






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toMinutes(millisecondsSinceStart) - TimeUnit already has constants for you
            $endgroup$
            – Alexey Ragozin
            23 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @AJNeufeld That's what I get for editing directly in the window instead of moving to my editor. Fixed, thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Stein
            13 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @AlexeyRagozin That's a good point. I personally find it harder to read in this case, but it's a good option for the OP to be aware of. Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Stein
            13 hours ago













          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Note that none of these suggestions will have any significant impact on the performance of your application overall. Don't micro-optimize performance until you have known, tested bottlenecks.



          The getTimestamp() method is noise. If all you care about is the current timestamp in milliseconds, use System.currentTimeMillis().



          You can use a constant to store the number of milliseconds in a minute, potentially saving the multiplication. Even if the compiler optimizes the math away, it's easier to read.



          A java.sql.Timestamp is a kind of java.util.Date, and the getTime() method is defined there. Your method should accept a java.util.Date to support more clients at no cost.



          Your method is poorly named. Something like getMinutesSince() would be more readable. Likewise, there are better variable names than what you've selected.



          Use final to indicate that variables won't be reassigned. That reduces the cognitive load on the reader.



          You don't really need as many variables as you have. You might even be able to get away with none and still have a reasonably clear method.



          If you were to use all my suggestions, your code might look more like:



          private static final long MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE = 60 * 1000;

          public static long getMinutesSince(final java.util.Date startTime)
          final long millisecondsSinceStart =
          System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime.getTime();
          return millisecondsSinceStart / MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE;






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Note that none of these suggestions will have any significant impact on the performance of your application overall. Don't micro-optimize performance until you have known, tested bottlenecks.



          The getTimestamp() method is noise. If all you care about is the current timestamp in milliseconds, use System.currentTimeMillis().



          You can use a constant to store the number of milliseconds in a minute, potentially saving the multiplication. Even if the compiler optimizes the math away, it's easier to read.



          A java.sql.Timestamp is a kind of java.util.Date, and the getTime() method is defined there. Your method should accept a java.util.Date to support more clients at no cost.



          Your method is poorly named. Something like getMinutesSince() would be more readable. Likewise, there are better variable names than what you've selected.



          Use final to indicate that variables won't be reassigned. That reduces the cognitive load on the reader.



          You don't really need as many variables as you have. You might even be able to get away with none and still have a reasonably clear method.



          If you were to use all my suggestions, your code might look more like:



          private static final long MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE = 60 * 1000;

          public static long getMinutesSince(final java.util.Date startTime)
          final long millisecondsSinceStart =
          System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime.getTime();
          return millisecondsSinceStart / MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE;







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 13 hours ago

























          answered yesterday









          Eric SteinEric Stein

          4,252613




          4,252613







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You might want to assign MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE to something. :-)
            $endgroup$
            – AJNeufeld
            yesterday






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toMinutes(millisecondsSinceStart) - TimeUnit already has constants for you
            $endgroup$
            – Alexey Ragozin
            23 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @AJNeufeld That's what I get for editing directly in the window instead of moving to my editor. Fixed, thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Stein
            13 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @AlexeyRagozin That's a good point. I personally find it harder to read in this case, but it's a good option for the OP to be aware of. Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Stein
            13 hours ago












          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You might want to assign MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE to something. :-)
            $endgroup$
            – AJNeufeld
            yesterday






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toMinutes(millisecondsSinceStart) - TimeUnit already has constants for you
            $endgroup$
            – Alexey Ragozin
            23 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @AJNeufeld That's what I get for editing directly in the window instead of moving to my editor. Fixed, thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Stein
            13 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @AlexeyRagozin That's a good point. I personally find it harder to read in this case, but it's a good option for the OP to be aware of. Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Stein
            13 hours ago







          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          You might want to assign MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE to something. :-)
          $endgroup$
          – AJNeufeld
          yesterday




          $begingroup$
          You might want to assign MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE to something. :-)
          $endgroup$
          – AJNeufeld
          yesterday




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toMinutes(millisecondsSinceStart) - TimeUnit already has constants for you
          $endgroup$
          – Alexey Ragozin
          23 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toMinutes(millisecondsSinceStart) - TimeUnit already has constants for you
          $endgroup$
          – Alexey Ragozin
          23 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @AJNeufeld That's what I get for editing directly in the window instead of moving to my editor. Fixed, thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – Eric Stein
          13 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @AJNeufeld That's what I get for editing directly in the window instead of moving to my editor. Fixed, thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – Eric Stein
          13 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @AlexeyRagozin That's a good point. I personally find it harder to read in this case, but it's a good option for the OP to be aware of. Thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – Eric Stein
          13 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @AlexeyRagozin That's a good point. I personally find it harder to read in this case, but it's a good option for the OP to be aware of. Thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – Eric Stein
          13 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215432%2fgetting-the-current-timestamp-and-compute-the-timestamp-difference-in-minutes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          कुँवर स्रोत दिक्चालन सूची"कुँवर""राणा कुँवरके वंशावली"

          Why is a white electrical wire connected to 2 black wires?How to wire a light fixture with 3 white wires in box?How should I wire a ceiling fan when there's only three wires in the box?Two white, two black, two ground, and red wire in ceiling box connected to switchWhy is there a white wire connected to multiple black wires in my light box?How to wire a light with two white wires and one black wireReplace light switch connected to a power outlet with dimmer - two black wires to one black and redHow to wire a light with multiple black/white/green wires from the ceiling?Ceiling box has 2 black and white wires but fan/ light only has 1 of eachWhy neutral wire connected to load wire?Switch with 2 black, 2 white, 2 ground and 1 red wire connected to ceiling light and a receptacle?

          चैत्य भूमि चित्र दीर्घा सन्दर्भ बाहरी कडियाँ दिक्चालन सूची"Chaitya Bhoomi""Chaitya Bhoomi: Statue of Equality in India""Dadar Chaitya Bhoomi: Statue of Equality in India""Ambedkar memorial: Centre okays transfer of Indu Mill land"चैत्यभमि