Combining an idiom with a metonymyDescribing a character's panic and confusionIs repetition justified in the following piece?Examples of Successful Rule-Breaking in NovelsWhen is repetition good?Problem: Aspiring writer, with dyslexia?Are there any successful precedents of “gentle” fourth-wall-breaking?In the digital age of Kindle and POD is a book ever finished?Ordinary writing or Prose: how to make it immersive?How do I write a MODERN combat/violence scene without being dry?How do we objectively assess if a dialogue sounds unnatural or cringy?
Why is the President allowed to veto a cancellation of emergency powers?
It's a yearly task, alright
Are all passive ability checks floors for active ability checks?
Gravity magic - How does it work?
Why did it take so long to abandon sail after steamships were demonstrated?
Could the Saturn V actually have launched astronauts around Venus?
Is it possible to upcast ritual spells?
Why doesn't the EU now just force the UK to choose between referendum and no-deal?
Interplanetary conflict, some disease destroys the ability to understand or appreciate music
Why would a flight no longer considered airworthy be redirected like this?
Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats
Why one should not leave fingerprints on bulbs and plugs?
Can someone explain to me where this proof goes wrong? (Twin Prime Conjecture)
How to change two letters closest to a string and one letter immediately after a string using notepad++
Who is flying the vertibirds?
How can I track script which gives me "command not found" right after the login?
How to explain that I do not want to visit a country due to personal safety concern?
Official degrees of earth’s rotation per day
Are there verbs that are neither telic, or atelic?
What approach do we need to follow for projects without a test environment?
If curse and magic is two sides of the same coin, why the former is forbidden?
Does someone need to be connected to my network to sniff HTTP requests?
PTIJ: Who should I vote for? (21st Knesset Edition)
Existence of subset with given Hausdorff dimension
Combining an idiom with a metonymy
Describing a character's panic and confusionIs repetition justified in the following piece?Examples of Successful Rule-Breaking in NovelsWhen is repetition good?Problem: Aspiring writer, with dyslexia?Are there any successful precedents of “gentle” fourth-wall-breaking?In the digital age of Kindle and POD is a book ever finished?Ordinary writing or Prose: how to make it immersive?How do I write a MODERN combat/violence scene without being dry?How do we objectively assess if a dialogue sounds unnatural or cringy?
I am not sure if this is possible. I would like to use a metonymy with an idiom, and it doesn't seem to be something people ever did, so it feels wrong.
I have the following sentence:
He was in the middle of our fedora hats celebrating our victory.
I am using it to mean the following:
He was in the middle of our (mafia) family celebrating our victory.
Not only it sounds weird, but it sounds wrong. I don't think there's something I did wrong, but the combination of the two makes it really weird. So can we combine the two or not?
creative-writing figures-of-speech
asked 3 hours ago
repomonsterrepomonster
1,8771137
add a comment |
I am not sure if this is possible. I would like to use a metonymy with an idiom, and it doesn't seem to be something people ever did, so it feels wrong.
I have the following sentence:
He was in the middle of our fedora hats celebrating our victory.
I am using it to mean the following:
He was in the middle of our (mafia) family celebrating our victory.
Not only it sounds weird, but it sounds wrong. I don't think there's something I did wrong, but the combination of the two makes it really weird. So can we combine the two or not?
creative-writing figures-of-speech
asked 3 hours ago
repomonsterrepomonster
1,8771137
add a comment |
I am not sure if this is possible. I would like to use a metonymy with an idiom, and it doesn't seem to be something people ever did, so it feels wrong.
I have the following sentence:
He was in the middle of our fedora hats celebrating our victory.
I am using it to mean the following:
He was in the middle of our (mafia) family celebrating our victory.
Not only it sounds weird, but it sounds wrong. I don't think there's something I did wrong, but the combination of the two makes it really weird. So can we combine the two or not?
creative-writing figures-of-speech
asked 3 hours ago
repomonsterrepomonster
1,8771137
I am not sure if this is possible. I would like to use a metonymy with an idiom, and it doesn't seem to be something people ever did, so it feels wrong.
I have the following sentence:
He was in the middle of our fedora hats celebrating our victory.
I am using it to mean the following:
He was in the middle of our (mafia) family celebrating our victory.
Not only it sounds weird, but it sounds wrong. I don't think there's something I did wrong, but the combination of the two makes it really weird. So can we combine the two or not?
creative-writing figures-of-speech
creative-writing figures-of-speech
asked 3 hours ago
repomonsterrepomonster
1,8771137
asked 3 hours ago
repomonsterrepomonster
1,8771137
asked 3 hours ago
repomonsterrepomonster
1,8771137
asked 3 hours ago
repomonsterrepomonster
1,8771137
asked 3 hours ago
repomonsterrepomonster
1,8771137
1,8771137
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The problem is more the meter of the sentence. How you say things makes as big of an impact as what you say.
The problem is furthered by the fact what you're trying to replace with "fedora hats", "mafia family". It feels bulky and cumbersome to the flow of the sentence. Most metonymies tend to be syllabalically shorter than what they replace. Sometimes the same length. They are almost never longer. "But 'fedora hats' is shorter than 'mafia family'!" But it's longer than "family."
In short, if you want to make a metonymy work better, try to use a three-syllable-or-less version.
This doesn't even start going into the issues based on if people will understand your metonymy. Establish that everyone is wearing fedoras then refer to the family as "hats" and that MAY work. Let's see how the sentence flows, knowing full well that this assumes fedoras were previously mentioned explicitly and clearly.
He was in the middle of our hats, celebrating our victory.
Sounds better to me. Is it perfect? Eh, not really, but perfection isn't the goal, improvement is.
answered 2 hours ago
Sora TamashiiSora Tamashii
1,121113
add a comment |
I don't think the problem is the combination, it is the unfamiliar metonymy. The use of "fedora hats" to mean "Mafia family" is just not common enough for the reader not to be thrown out of the text, saying "What did that mean" and probably coming to a wrong answer. If a more familiar metonymy with a bit of context is used, such as:
It was election night. He was in the middle of the elephants celebrating our victory.
Where "the elephants" is being used to mean "members of the Republican party" -- a very comon expression, mostly in visual cartoons, I think it works.
If there is extra context, if "fedora hats" has previously been established to have this meaning in this story it might work. Or even:
All the Family was there, particularly Frank. He was in the middle of our Fedora Hats celebrating our victory.
might work.
I might add, there really isn't much of an idiom here.
answered 3 hours ago
David SiegelDavid Siegel
1,318118
idioms.thefreedictionary.com/in+the+middle+of
– repomonster
2 hours ago
How come metonymies need to use familiar expressions while it's not the case for metaphors?
– repomonster
2 hours ago
@repomonster : The problem would be the same for a metaphor. A figure of speech needs to be either familiar , or else obvious enough that most readers will recognize irt fairly easily -- unless in an unusual case, the point is to be obscure. Normally if the reader is puzzled, it disrupts the flow. It can even cause a reader to abandon the work.
– David Siegel
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "166"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43612%2fcombining-an-idiom-with-a-metonymy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The problem is more the meter of the sentence. How you say things makes as big of an impact as what you say.
The problem is furthered by the fact what you're trying to replace with "fedora hats", "mafia family". It feels bulky and cumbersome to the flow of the sentence. Most metonymies tend to be syllabalically shorter than what they replace. Sometimes the same length. They are almost never longer. "But 'fedora hats' is shorter than 'mafia family'!" But it's longer than "family."
In short, if you want to make a metonymy work better, try to use a three-syllable-or-less version.
This doesn't even start going into the issues based on if people will understand your metonymy. Establish that everyone is wearing fedoras then refer to the family as "hats" and that MAY work. Let's see how the sentence flows, knowing full well that this assumes fedoras were previously mentioned explicitly and clearly.
He was in the middle of our hats, celebrating our victory.
Sounds better to me. Is it perfect? Eh, not really, but perfection isn't the goal, improvement is.
answered 2 hours ago
Sora TamashiiSora Tamashii
1,121113
add a comment |
The problem is more the meter of the sentence. How you say things makes as big of an impact as what you say.
The problem is furthered by the fact what you're trying to replace with "fedora hats", "mafia family". It feels bulky and cumbersome to the flow of the sentence. Most metonymies tend to be syllabalically shorter than what they replace. Sometimes the same length. They are almost never longer. "But 'fedora hats' is shorter than 'mafia family'!" But it's longer than "family."
In short, if you want to make a metonymy work better, try to use a three-syllable-or-less version.
This doesn't even start going into the issues based on if people will understand your metonymy. Establish that everyone is wearing fedoras then refer to the family as "hats" and that MAY work. Let's see how the sentence flows, knowing full well that this assumes fedoras were previously mentioned explicitly and clearly.
He was in the middle of our hats, celebrating our victory.
Sounds better to me. Is it perfect? Eh, not really, but perfection isn't the goal, improvement is.
answered 2 hours ago
Sora TamashiiSora Tamashii
1,121113
add a comment |
The problem is more the meter of the sentence. How you say things makes as big of an impact as what you say.
The problem is furthered by the fact what you're trying to replace with "fedora hats", "mafia family". It feels bulky and cumbersome to the flow of the sentence. Most metonymies tend to be syllabalically shorter than what they replace. Sometimes the same length. They are almost never longer. "But 'fedora hats' is shorter than 'mafia family'!" But it's longer than "family."
In short, if you want to make a metonymy work better, try to use a three-syllable-or-less version.
This doesn't even start going into the issues based on if people will understand your metonymy. Establish that everyone is wearing fedoras then refer to the family as "hats" and that MAY work. Let's see how the sentence flows, knowing full well that this assumes fedoras were previously mentioned explicitly and clearly.
He was in the middle of our hats, celebrating our victory.
Sounds better to me. Is it perfect? Eh, not really, but perfection isn't the goal, improvement is.
answered 2 hours ago
Sora TamashiiSora Tamashii
1,121113
The problem is more the meter of the sentence. How you say things makes as big of an impact as what you say.
The problem is furthered by the fact what you're trying to replace with "fedora hats", "mafia family". It feels bulky and cumbersome to the flow of the sentence. Most metonymies tend to be syllabalically shorter than what they replace. Sometimes the same length. They are almost never longer. "But 'fedora hats' is shorter than 'mafia family'!" But it's longer than "family."
In short, if you want to make a metonymy work better, try to use a three-syllable-or-less version.
This doesn't even start going into the issues based on if people will understand your metonymy. Establish that everyone is wearing fedoras then refer to the family as "hats" and that MAY work. Let's see how the sentence flows, knowing full well that this assumes fedoras were previously mentioned explicitly and clearly.
He was in the middle of our hats, celebrating our victory.
Sounds better to me. Is it perfect? Eh, not really, but perfection isn't the goal, improvement is.
answered 2 hours ago
Sora TamashiiSora Tamashii
1,121113
answered 2 hours ago
Sora TamashiiSora Tamashii
1,121113
answered 2 hours ago
Sora TamashiiSora Tamashii
1,121113
answered 2 hours ago
Sora TamashiiSora Tamashii
1,121113
1,121113
add a comment |
add a comment |
I don't think the problem is the combination, it is the unfamiliar metonymy. The use of "fedora hats" to mean "Mafia family" is just not common enough for the reader not to be thrown out of the text, saying "What did that mean" and probably coming to a wrong answer. If a more familiar metonymy with a bit of context is used, such as:
It was election night. He was in the middle of the elephants celebrating our victory.
Where "the elephants" is being used to mean "members of the Republican party" -- a very comon expression, mostly in visual cartoons, I think it works.
If there is extra context, if "fedora hats" has previously been established to have this meaning in this story it might work. Or even:
All the Family was there, particularly Frank. He was in the middle of our Fedora Hats celebrating our victory.
might work.
I might add, there really isn't much of an idiom here.
answered 3 hours ago
David SiegelDavid Siegel
1,318118
idioms.thefreedictionary.com/in+the+middle+of
– repomonster
2 hours ago
How come metonymies need to use familiar expressions while it's not the case for metaphors?
– repomonster
2 hours ago
@repomonster : The problem would be the same for a metaphor. A figure of speech needs to be either familiar , or else obvious enough that most readers will recognize irt fairly easily -- unless in an unusual case, the point is to be obscure. Normally if the reader is puzzled, it disrupts the flow. It can even cause a reader to abandon the work.
– David Siegel
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I don't think the problem is the combination, it is the unfamiliar metonymy. The use of "fedora hats" to mean "Mafia family" is just not common enough for the reader not to be thrown out of the text, saying "What did that mean" and probably coming to a wrong answer. If a more familiar metonymy with a bit of context is used, such as:
It was election night. He was in the middle of the elephants celebrating our victory.
Where "the elephants" is being used to mean "members of the Republican party" -- a very comon expression, mostly in visual cartoons, I think it works.
If there is extra context, if "fedora hats" has previously been established to have this meaning in this story it might work. Or even:
All the Family was there, particularly Frank. He was in the middle of our Fedora Hats celebrating our victory.
might work.
I might add, there really isn't much of an idiom here.
answered 3 hours ago
David SiegelDavid Siegel
1,318118
idioms.thefreedictionary.com/in+the+middle+of
– repomonster
2 hours ago
How come metonymies need to use familiar expressions while it's not the case for metaphors?
– repomonster
2 hours ago
@repomonster : The problem would be the same for a metaphor. A figure of speech needs to be either familiar , or else obvious enough that most readers will recognize irt fairly easily -- unless in an unusual case, the point is to be obscure. Normally if the reader is puzzled, it disrupts the flow. It can even cause a reader to abandon the work.
– David Siegel
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I don't think the problem is the combination, it is the unfamiliar metonymy. The use of "fedora hats" to mean "Mafia family" is just not common enough for the reader not to be thrown out of the text, saying "What did that mean" and probably coming to a wrong answer. If a more familiar metonymy with a bit of context is used, such as:
It was election night. He was in the middle of the elephants celebrating our victory.
Where "the elephants" is being used to mean "members of the Republican party" -- a very comon expression, mostly in visual cartoons, I think it works.
If there is extra context, if "fedora hats" has previously been established to have this meaning in this story it might work. Or even:
All the Family was there, particularly Frank. He was in the middle of our Fedora Hats celebrating our victory.
might work.
I might add, there really isn't much of an idiom here.
answered 3 hours ago
David SiegelDavid Siegel
1,318118
I don't think the problem is the combination, it is the unfamiliar metonymy. The use of "fedora hats" to mean "Mafia family" is just not common enough for the reader not to be thrown out of the text, saying "What did that mean" and probably coming to a wrong answer. If a more familiar metonymy with a bit of context is used, such as:
It was election night. He was in the middle of the elephants celebrating our victory.
Where "the elephants" is being used to mean "members of the Republican party" -- a very comon expression, mostly in visual cartoons, I think it works.
If there is extra context, if "fedora hats" has previously been established to have this meaning in this story it might work. Or even:
All the Family was there, particularly Frank. He was in the middle of our Fedora Hats celebrating our victory.
might work.
I might add, there really isn't much of an idiom here.
answered 3 hours ago
David SiegelDavid Siegel
1,318118
answered 3 hours ago
David SiegelDavid Siegel
1,318118
answered 3 hours ago
David SiegelDavid Siegel
1,318118
answered 3 hours ago
David SiegelDavid Siegel
1,318118
1,318118
idioms.thefreedictionary.com/in+the+middle+of
– repomonster
2 hours ago
How come metonymies need to use familiar expressions while it's not the case for metaphors?
– repomonster
2 hours ago
@repomonster : The problem would be the same for a metaphor. A figure of speech needs to be either familiar , or else obvious enough that most readers will recognize irt fairly easily -- unless in an unusual case, the point is to be obscure. Normally if the reader is puzzled, it disrupts the flow. It can even cause a reader to abandon the work.
– David Siegel
2 hours ago
add a comment |
idioms.thefreedictionary.com/in+the+middle+of
– repomonster
2 hours ago
How come metonymies need to use familiar expressions while it's not the case for metaphors?
– repomonster
2 hours ago
@repomonster : The problem would be the same for a metaphor. A figure of speech needs to be either familiar , or else obvious enough that most readers will recognize irt fairly easily -- unless in an unusual case, the point is to be obscure. Normally if the reader is puzzled, it disrupts the flow. It can even cause a reader to abandon the work.
– David Siegel
2 hours ago
idioms.thefreedictionary.com/in+the+middle+of
– repomonster
2 hours ago
idioms.thefreedictionary.com/in+the+middle+of
– repomonster
2 hours ago
How come metonymies need to use familiar expressions while it's not the case for metaphors?
– repomonster
2 hours ago
How come metonymies need to use familiar expressions while it's not the case for metaphors?
– repomonster
2 hours ago
@repomonster : The problem would be the same for a metaphor. A figure of speech needs to be either familiar , or else obvious enough that most readers will recognize irt fairly easily -- unless in an unusual case, the point is to be obscure. Normally if the reader is puzzled, it disrupts the flow. It can even cause a reader to abandon the work.
– David Siegel
2 hours ago
@repomonster : The problem would be the same for a metaphor. A figure of speech needs to be either familiar , or else obvious enough that most readers will recognize irt fairly easily -- unless in an unusual case, the point is to be obscure. Normally if the reader is puzzled, it disrupts the flow. It can even cause a reader to abandon the work.
– David Siegel
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43612%2fcombining-an-idiom-with-a-metonymy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
